....But you may well be right, Tom. Hooks may be a better solution here.
I'll make up a pair and see if I like them better.
Mac
Ckanite wrote:I think a pair of hooks would look and function better, not just 1 IMO.
I answer with hearing and obeying.Galileo wrote:I like the bottom hook better (the heart) - but I like either hook better than the buckle.
Xtracted wrote:Shouldn't there be an overlap in the maille or will it be covered by the dangly bits?
The side tassets will cover the joint in the mail.Kerry Pratt wrote:I know this defeats the good looks of the hooks you built, but if you put the hook in the right direction, according to the picture you posted, and then put the body of the hook underneath the mail, it would then be protected from sword strikes and you could have overlap of the mail.
These are just two of the many ways that the better armorers avoid getting paid enough.bartholomew wrote:I knew it! I told myself that anybody who didn't like the way a simple greave pin didn't sit correctly would NEVER let that opening stay that way it was! Bravo......you did exactly what I thought you would do. That's why you're Mac!
Happened to me last year. Almost made me close up shop and it's one of the main reasons I have a part time job again. Sometimes life just get's in the way.bartholomew wrote:Mac: I can tell you from years of experience it happens to ALL businesses, mine included. As it was once told to me, one should never strike out every trip to the plate, nor does one hit a home run every time either. But with enough bunts, singles and a few timely placed doubles, and a few nice triples you will usually win the game!
That is a gross and rather unfair oversimplification, depending on who you're talking to...Mac wrote:Businessman
Craftsman
Engineer
Artist
Poet
Mathematician
Architect
Philosopher
Scientist
All of these people belong to Homo sapiens, and all are part of an interbreeding population; but they all think differently. Their brains are all wired differently, and that drives them to do what they do. The mind of any one is inexplicable to the mind of any other.
Mac
Of course it is, but you understand what I mean. To say it subtly, fairly, and elaborately would take many pages. I hope you are not offended.Gerhard von Liebau wrote: That is a gross and rather unfair oversimplification, depending on who you're talking to...
That arrangement is pretty standard with Italian armors, but I can't bring any other German examples to mind right now. With a hinged cuirasse, like the Italians made, one of the tassets is not particular problem. In fact, they are sometimes attached without any buckles on the hinge side. The buckle side is more troublesome, as at least one of straps must be disassemblable.Sean M wrote:Am I seeing a tasset which will hang from one strap on the fore-fauld and one strap on the rear-fauld? Seems like it would add unnecessary bother in putting on the armour, but I don't know this style.
I'm not at all surprised. I don't think the market for them is big enough to support their production. Not enough people know they need them, and they are a pain to make. What's more, when you need them at all, you need them by the hundred. Many folks are willing to splurge and buy a dozen fancy rivets for their helmet, but this it an order of magnitude jump.Sean M wrote:I am a bit surprised that nobody is selling those capped rivets yet. Focusing on one task for a few days is more efficient for everyone, and there are plenty of people selling brass and bronze fittings cast from originals. Now that I know to look for them, they are pretty common in 16th century armour.