High Carbon Steel Sheet

This forum is designed to help us spread the knowledge of armouring.
Post Reply
User avatar
Patrick
Archive Member
Posts: 1040
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska, USA

High Carbon Steel Sheet

Post by Patrick »

Several people have posted several sources of high-carbon sheet steel in the last year. Unfortunately, I can't turn any up with the Search function. Several discussions, sure, but no sources mentioned.

Y'all wanna post em again, please? Thanks in advance!

-Patrick
Sinric
Archive Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Contact:

Post by Sinric »

If you want to make heat treated armour I would recommend buying annealed 1050 or 1075 carbon steel (also known as spring steel). You can buy 1050 or 1075 from Admiral Steel http://www.admiralsteel.com/ . McMaster-Carr sells small sheets of annealed 1075 http://www.mcmaster.com/ .

------------------
Craig Nadler
cwn@nh.ultranet.com
http://www.eskimo.com/~cwn/
Guest

Post by Guest »

Sinric,

If you were going to make non-heat treated armour. What metal would you suggest?
Armour Guy
Archive Member
Posts: 815
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Voorhees, NJ 08043 USA
Contact:

Post by Armour Guy »

Dane,

Depends on the amount of work/money you want to put in - Mild steel and stainless are obvious choices - Mild is easier to form, but less hard (dent resistant) than an equal gauge (tougher to form) stainless. IN addition, stainless is more expensive.

Neither can be heat-treated, but both can be work-hardened to an extent.

------------------
~AG
Utopia Armoury - Your one stop shoppe for all your maille needs!
Champion of Arland the Bastard
Weilder of the Rusty Spork of Doom!
Sinric
Archive Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Contact:

Post by Sinric »

Dane,

Either 1050 (0.5% carbon) or 1075 (0.75% carbon) will work for most things. However, if you are going to be doing a lot of hot work on a plate like raising a helmet then you are going to lose some carbon content. In that case you may want to use 1075 instead of 1050.



------------------
Craig Nadler
cwn@nh.ultranet.com
http://www.eskimo.com/~cwn/
Post Reply