Page 1 of 1
SCA secondary metal thickness
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2002 3:17 pm
by Otto
For SCA usage... what opinions on 18 guage stainless... thick enough for arms, gorgets, spaulders.
I think it would be, but can't recall ever having used it in the past, so thought I'd check.
------------------
Otto's Armoury
(home of one HIGHLY overworked armourer!)
http://www.members.tripod.com/SBvast
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2002 5:11 pm
by Jean Paul de Sens
good for gorget's...done this
good for spaulders...done this
ok for arms...
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2002 5:13 pm
by Alcyoneus
Yes.
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2002 11:12 am
by hjalmr
In the lighter hitting areas I have found that 18g mild steel works for everything but thighs and forearms (and helmets of coarse) -so 18g SS should work great. I have a 4' piece of 18g SS out in the shed that has mine name written all over it -if I ever get the time to remake my armor...
(^_^)
------------------
Hjalmar of Sognefjord
House Bearkiller
Barony of Grey Niche, Meridies.
"True nobility is not measured by being superior to another, but rather by becoming superior to oneself."
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2002 11:39 am
by Pheylin Quinn
18ga Stainless is tough enough for the following, IMHO:
Rerebraces
Vambraces
Lames/Articulation
Greaves
Gorgets
Gaunts
Anything else is just added weight, for the most part. This should be plenty to keep you safe.
If someone hits you hard enough to cause bodily harm while you are wearing 18ga in the above mentioned places, they are hitting too hard for SCA combat, IMHO.
I am full of opinions today.
Pheylin
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2003 9:51 am
by Mad Matt
Well technically speaking 18ga mild is legal for everything except the helmet since the definition of hard over soft is for 18ga mild steel or equivalent with no requirements to have an equal weight.
------------------
The budding mid 14th century German Transitional guy.
Mad Matt's Armory