Page 1 of 1
The Midrealm Royal Navy
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:51 pm
by Ceadda
TRMs declared upon acending the throne on May the 1st that the Rapier fighters are now members of the Royal Navy of the Inland Seas, by letters of Mark.
A Comodore will be named at Baron Wars this weekend.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:04 pm
by Rutgur
A clarification, if you please:
All good King's men who sail, in fealty, under the ensign of the Middle Kingdom shall be, for the duration of Our reign, be organized and otherwise conscripted as the Midrealm Royal Navy. Any who remain outside of fealty, or otherwise remain beyond the reach of the Crown, may act for the express benefit of the Midrealm, per the conditions detailed within the Letter of Mark read aloud during Our morning Court upon the day of Our Coronation. Said Letter of Mark, shall remain securely in the possession of the Queen's Rapier Champion as Our personal representative in the Midrealm Royal Navy.
The Commodore of the Midrealm Royal Navy will indeed be named forthwith at Baron Wars.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:26 pm
by Tomburr
What is the motivation behind the creation of a Royal Navy? Is this so more people can be swashbucklers?
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:48 pm
by Glaukos the Athenian
Tomburr wrote:What is the motivation behind the creation of a Royal Navy? Is this so more people can be swashbucklers?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM6I0i7c ... re=related
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 5:20 pm
by DukeAvery
Since letters of mark are mentioned ...oh dear...this can only be a prelude to the taking of unescorted prizes.
Surely no good can come of this!
Regards
Avery
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:33 am
by Rutgur
Tomburr wrote:What is the motivation behind the creation of a Royal Navy? Is this so more people can be swashbucklers?
Armored combat represents the "army". Where there is a land battle to be fought, a King sends his army to fight it. King's don't have "heavy" armies and "light" armies, they have Their Army! Creating a Royal Navy places a different emphasis on rapier combat by providing them goals and responsibilities that are not superfluous with armored combat. Too often, rapier is given "second class" status behind armored combat. By establishing a new focus, which is disparate from the focus of armored combat, rapier combat is lifted above "civilian personal defense" which would seem to be at odds with the idea of rapier combat en masse (lest there be street brawling).
This also is intended to add a new angle of fun to Our game. Many of those who chose later period personas and/or participate in rapier combat already have an interest in this aspect of history - they now have an outlet with the full support of the Crown.
Finally, I have a certain distain for the term "rapier community". Royal Navy sounds so much better.
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:44 am
by BdeB
Oh what the hell.
If our Knights can be knights without horses, then I guess our Navy can be Navy without boats.

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:54 am
by Skutai
It's going to end with someone smashed like a bowl of eggs. These kind of things always do.
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:59 am
by Sean Powell
And they can all follow Capt Jack Sparrow to the fencing list?
I suppose if people are going to dress like post-period pirates then it is easier to go with the flow then to buck the system.
But the comparison to horseless knights was a pretty apt comparison.
Sean
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 9:15 am
by Cap'n Atli
The next thing you know it will be The Royal Horse Marines!
If any of these Midrealm swashbucklers want to get their sea legs, I'm sure some of the ships in ASTA will accomodate them.
http://tallships.sailtraining.org/
Of course, we could take them out, too. But how much will his Majesty pay for us to bring them back?
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 10:14 am
by Guy Dawkins
Sean Powell wrote:And they can all follow Capt Jack Sparrow to the fencing list?
I suppose if people are going to dress like post-period pirates then it is easier to go with the flow then to buck the system.
But the comparison to horseless knights was a pretty apt comparison.
Sean
But wouldn't men (and women) sworn to protect the kings waters hunt down and kill pirates?
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 10:31 am
by Ceadda
Thanks for the Clarification, Your Royal Majesty!
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 10:42 am
by Sean Powell
Guy Dawkins wrote:But wouldn't men (and women) sworn to protect the kings waters hunt down and kill pirates?
Depends entirely on the letters of mark that the pirates may be carying. Carying the right letter and they are 'privateers' instead... of course they could be arrested for evading conscription but I have no idea if evading conscription is a shooting, hanging or walking the plank offense.
Sean
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 11:07 am
by Cap'n Atli
Isn't it "Letters of Marque?"
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 11:45 am
by Steve S.
If our Knights can be knights without horses, then I guess our Navy can be Navy without boats.
That was funny!
Steve
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 12:06 pm
by Gorm
Enquiring(*) minds wanna know....
Does this mean an impending Naval battle at Pennsic?
Should Atlantia reform the Atlantian Navy? Heck, were we ever deformed officially?
If there is a naval battle at Pennsic, may I humbly request it *NOT* be at the Classic Swimming hole? thank you.
(*) In the National sense...
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 12:10 pm
by DukeAvery
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 12:25 pm
by Diglach Mac Cein
Isn't it "Letters of Marque?"
No, Letters of Rutgur.
.
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 12:57 pm
by BdeB
Cap'n Atli wrote:
Of course, we could take them out, too. But how much will his Majesty pay for us to bring them back?
Who says he would?!?

Perhaps that is the plan all along....

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:28 pm
by Guy Dawkins
Sean Powell wrote:Guy Dawkins wrote:But wouldn't men (and women) sworn to protect the kings waters hunt down and kill pirates?
Depends entirely on the letters of mark that the pirates may be carying. Carying the right letter and they are 'privateers' instead... of course they could be arrested for evading conscription but I have no idea if evading conscription is a shooting, hanging or walking the plank offense.
Sean
Pirates wouldn't be carrying letters of marque. That's why the Midrealm Royal Navy would hunt them down.
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:02 pm
by Ingvarr
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:16 pm
by Saritor
Guy Dawkins wrote:Pirates wouldn't be carrying letters of marque. That's why the Midrealm Royal Navy would hunt them down.
One man's pirate is another's privateer, whether he bears a letter of marque and reprisal or not.

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:50 pm
by Cap'n Atli
Saritor wrote:Guy Dawkins wrote:Pirates wouldn't be carrying letters of marque. That's why the Midrealm Royal Navy would hunt them down.
One man's pirate is another's privateer, whether he bears a Letter of Marque and Reprisal or not.

Follow the money! Cui bono? Letters of Marque were issued by many governments, some more legitimate than others. For instance, is the Letter of Marque from rebelious English colonies in North America sufficient to keep you from being hung as a pirate? Hah! You are obvious both a traitor to the crown AND a pirate!
(I will note that Captain Kidd's Letter of Marque was found filed away in London several hundred years after he was hanged for piracy. Funny how key pieces of evidence get misplaced when grand schemes misfire!)