Page 1 of 1
great swords (SCA)
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2004 11:12 pm
by Thorstenn
Is there any proof that they used 7 1/2 foot great swords, and if not what was the average size
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:27 am
by Alcyoneus
Most period GS would generally fall in the 5 1/2- 6 1/2' range, and probably 7-12 pounds.
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:46 am
by Murdock
Egad 7 1/2 feet!
thats bearing sword size afaik!
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2004 12:53 am
by Winterfell
Most great swords ranged in the 5 to 7 pounds not 7 to 12.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Alcyoneus:
Most period GS would generally fall in the 5 1/2- 6 1/2' range, and probably 7-12 pounds.</font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
------------------
"As long as there are fanatics there will always be heretics"
http://www.caerdubh.com
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:28 am
by Alcyoneus
Here are two online sources for sword weights:
http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/cariadoc/shield_and_weapon_weights.htmlhttp://www.palus.demon.co.uk/Sword_Stats.htmlMany of these "2 Handed Swords" are about 4' long, so you'll have to add about 50% to their weight to approximate a 6' GS. So, Cariadoc's examples would range from 6-12#, with only 2 of 7 under 7#
The other lists the shortest being at about 5.9#, but only 4'9", so it would go over 7# at 6'. The lightest is 5.4# at 66.3", so it would be just under 6# at 6'. Most are well above that. Also, without seeing the pictures of the swords he used, I can't tell if he is looking at estocs, or true 2 handers. (app 64 examples)
I've gone through some of my other catalogs, and found the approximations I gave earlier. I would really prefer not to be hit with a 14# GS myself, it would take a lot of fun out of this game.

But I think Calontir's 4.5# limit, uh, silly.

------------------
"Stop letting him hit you!"- advice given to Sir Ulrich von Lichtenstein of Gelderland at the Tournament at Roen
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:03 am
by James B.
Alcyoneus
The second example is a German collection and the lengths indicate Zweihanders to me. Look in Oakshott’s book on swords, Winterfell is right most 2 handed and bastard swords run 5 to 7 pounds.
Flonzy
------------------
Cheap garb is as bad as plastic armor.
http://home.armourarchive.org/members/flonzy
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:40 pm
by Alcyoneus
I'll look, but what you are saying does not agree with the sample presented here of 71 swords. Only 16 of which are under 7#, and all of which are under 6'.
For a proportionate 6' 2 handed sword to weigh between 5-7#, the weight would have to fall in the range of app. 13.3 ounces/foot (1.1ounce/inch) and 18.6 ounces/foot (1.55ounce/inch). Clearly, most of the 14 exceed this as well.
I can pull out this many examples, and more, out of my catalogs. Bastard swords, of course, could be lighter because they were meant to be swung one handed, not so 2 handed or great swords.
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:43 pm
by Alcyoneus
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by flonzy:
<B>Alcyoneus
the lengths indicate Zweihanders to me. Flonzy
</B></font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
They could also be estocs, length alone indicates little besides length.

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:11 pm
by Gaston de Vieuxchamps
To me this side conversation on weight (not that again) just supports the idea that period greatswords just weren't that long which I believe was the original query.
------------------
Non Onme Quod Licet Honestum Est
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:23 pm
by Alcyoneus
The longest in the second, larger sample was about 6'6". Ansteorra allows 7 1/2' GS, I guess because they also allow 7 1/2' unpadded polearms.
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:55 pm
by Thorstenn
So then why do we allow such a large sword in the SCA? Pole arms were large, from a bearded axe, to a swiss pike, to a glaive,or a yari spear but no real documentation of 7 1/2 foot great swords. Should we ban swords over 6 feet?
------------------
Thorstenn,
Do or do not, there is no try!
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 12:48 am
by Alcyoneus
I guess they saw no practical reason not to allow it. It's a 7 1/2' polearm with quillions.

Calontir allows 6' max, but if I want to build a polearm that looks like a GS, but meets PA reqs, I probably could.
[This message has been edited by Alcyoneus (edited 01-09-2004).]
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2004 2:44 pm
by Alcyoneus
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Thorstenn:
Is there any proof that they used 7 1/2 foot great swords, and if not what was the average size</font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Okay, I did find one example in Treasures of the Tower.7'7" and 14# 6oz. 55" blade, and 26" grip. It's a early 15thC bearing sword.