Page 1 of 1

Historical Atlas of Weaponry (ISBN 0-7858-2595-9) p76

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:47 am
by freiman the minstrel
Guys,

I found a picture on Page 76 of Historical Atlas of Weaponry (ISBN 0-7858-2595-9) on p76, in the left marginis a picture of a double bit axe, like a Molly Hatchet album cover.

I had never seen a bit of evidence that a double bit axe had ever been used in warfare, at least until the horrible things that people were making for trench warfare during WW1. The book, which in general seems pretty good on the scholarship perspective, lists it as "Viking Battleaxe with an iron blade. Axes might not pierce the skin but when swung with sufficient force they could cause bruising and internal injuries."

It was the only reference to an actual extant medieval double bit axe I have ever seen.

Did I get it completely wrong?

f

Re: Historical Atlas of Weaponry (ISBN 0-7858-2595-9) p76

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:33 pm
by raito
If it says axes may not pierce skin than I'd say it's the one that's wrong.

Re: Historical Atlas of Weaponry (ISBN 0-7858-2595-9) p76

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:45 am
by Baron Alcyoneus
Picture?

Re: Historical Atlas of Weaponry (ISBN 0-7858-2595-9) p76

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 6:44 pm
by Russ Mitchell
Common in Persia.