Page 1 of 1

i want this sword.

Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 2:01 pm
by hornsofodin
I want this sword. Anyone out there make a replica?
Image

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 1:35 pm
by Thorsteinn Raudskeggr
Have you talked to Arms & Armor?

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 1:44 pm
by hornsofodin
Thorsteinn Raudskeggr wrote:Have you talked to Arms & Armor?

do you have a link? whem i run arms & armor through google i get a broad range of different things.

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 2:10 pm
by Konstantin the Red
Armor.com seems the guts of a link you want. I searched "two handed sword for sale arms armour" and got there.

http://armor.com/sword156.html looks to be in the neighborhood -- nearly five feet overall and six pounds and an ounce.

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 2:44 pm
by hornsofodin
the handle is too short. hmmm me thinks this may be a custom job.....

this is closer handle wise.

http://armor.com/custom931.html

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 3:16 pm
by hornsofodin
im assuming its an estoc of some sort. just a bit wider than the ones ive seen.

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 5:30 pm
by Thorsteinn Raudskeggr
They do Custom work often. They did a beautiful Swiss Saber a while back.

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Wed May 21, 2014 2:14 am
by Konstantin the Red
Its slenderness looks faintly estoc-ish, but it may simply be that this is quite a late twohander sword that isn't a Zwei mit Parierhaken. Don't believe estocs had that length of grip. They became increasingly like armor piercing rapiers as they developed.

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 10:04 am
by J.G.Elmslie
Konstantin the Red wrote: Don't believe estocs had that length of grip. They became increasingly like armor piercing rapiers as they developed.
I've seen milanese tuck/estoc with triangle-section blade and a longer grip than that one.

Re: i want this sword.

Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:06 pm
by freiman the minstrel
Some folks here already know, and I am taking the risk of looking like an idiot again, but, well, it's a feeling that I am familiar with.

That is Figure 37, plate 2, page 27, from Stone's Glossary. According to the note, it's in the Metropolitan Museum. I am not positive that "Plate" is the right word there. Figure 37 shows two photos, and it is the second photo in the figure.

f