Page 1 of 4
Martial Art vs Martial Sport
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:52 am
by Duncanthemonster
On another thread...
http://forums.armourarchive.org/phpBB2/ ... hp?t=41317
The discussion was rasied of is SCA Combat a martial art or not.
So as not to derail...I decided to start this lil freak show...
here's my point of view>>>
Although I love SCA Combat, and participate more than my Lady Love would really like me to...I am gonna have to say no.
Not a Martial Art in the true sense.
Neither is Kendo, Kempo, Jui-Jistu, Karate, what have ya...
if it is being done without killing or maiming folks ON PURPOSE!!
It is a sport. a sport based on a fighting form that is as an ligialmet(sp?)
Martial Art as any other.
When you use any fighting form/style/method to compete in a game...it's a sport...when you pick a 'fake' name to do it, it might be a LARP

,
I love to fight. I would do it 3 times a week if I could find the time/money/kitchen pass. However..it is not, in my very very very humble view, a Martial Art.
Hate me if ya must...or make me see your POV.
Looking forward to the discussion, and hoping it doesn't spiral outta control......
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:10 am
by Sir Daniel
Okay, so give us a list of 'real' martial arts and tell us why they are and SCA heavy fighting is not?
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:28 am
by Animal
Non lethal combat is very historical.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:34 am
by Duncanthemonster
Anything where the outcome is death.
The forms of fighting, whereever they come from, where ment to damage people. When you spar in any form...it's a game.
A game Based on a Martial Art...not the art it's self.
let me try and make that more clear.
lets say there was the Anceint Art of Ku-Fu-Ka...a graceful, yet brutal way of turning people into chuncky salsa used in the XXth century in Uberfarastain by local fisherman....now a days, the only folks who know anything about it meet at strip malls and swat at each other with padded fish.
The have judges, a rule makeing body, and a ranking system.
They hold twice yearly competions where the person who best swats all commers with a padded fish wins a bowl of pickled eggs.
Is that a Martial Art? I see it as a sport based on a Martial Art...but it's a sport now.
Can it be reto-fitted from sport to Art? Yup...as soon as fish are once agian the ultimite weapon. Can the practicioers of the modern sport claim to understand what those wise fisherman knew? In a distant no life or death way...sure. Truly...nope.
Does a guy who has never served in the Military, and been in an acutal firefight know what it is like...because he's played HALO? or paintball?
Paintball is very similar to small unit fireteam action....but it ain't "for real"
Done both...not the same thing...similar in many respects, but not the same.
Make any sense?
Re: Martial Art vs Martial Sport
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:34 am
by St. George
Duncanthemonster wrote:I would do it 3 times a week if I could find the time/money/kitchen pass.
Duncan,
You can fight almost as much as your schedule will alllow. I live like five blocks from you, but haven't seen you (or your lady) in forever. I ain't going to mention that Viscount Sir Brion of Bellatrix lives in the same house I do, and most people would kill to be able to come over and work out with us as often as you could, but...
You can come and work out ANYTIME our schedules match up, not to mention that I think our women folk get along which might make your SCA participation a little easier...
Let me know when you want to come hang out. I always enjoy chances to hang out with and fight with you.
Hope to see you soon,
Alaric
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:37 am
by Duncanthemonster
Agreed Animal...but usally those where done as a training tool for leathal.
the end result was to make a better killer. Not someone who could "win" a match...someone who could make people dead.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:40 am
by Fearghus Macildubh
I'll agree that SCA fighting is more "sporty" than other martial endeavors, but to say that unless you are locked in mortal combat, you're not doing a martial art is just silly.
If what you are doing has applications to the real use of weapons, be fists or knives, you are practicing a martial art. If you look at 19th century French cane fighting techniques, many SCA strikes directly correspond to the strikes shown. Since cane fighting was one of the ways a 19th cent gentleman was expected to defend himself, does that not make the techniques martial arts?
SCA combat is what it is. I like the free form aspect of it. Given some simple parameters, I can do what I want. I'd like a little more shield contact and body to body contact, but I can live with it the way it is.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:41 am
by Duncanthemonster
HEY Your Grace!!
I know I have got to get up with you real time...lol...as you can see from when I am posting....not alot of free time during 'Human' hours. After midterms (next week) I should start getting some loose time.
Say Hi to Bri and your LOVELY Lady for me...I miss hanging out with you guys

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:43 am
by Aaron
A Martial Art prides itself in style, form, perfection of self and looks. Katas in Karate and Jui-Jituzu qualify as Martial Art – they are for the viewing of the crowd. A Pas-de-Arms for SCA might qualify in this regard.
A Martial Sport prides itself in success. Examples include Judo, Fencing, Boxing, Archery, Taekwondo and Wresting – all Olympic Sports. The Tuchux all-out fights or Crown Tourney for the SCA might qualify in this regard.
But, that being said there is both sport and art in SCA heavy fighting. I fight for my lady and the crowd, and frankly I’m putting on a show…so I’m a Martial Artist. My local KSCAs fight to win, so they fight in a Martial Sport. We’re both in the same ring, with different objectives, but it’s still fun.
-Aaron
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:52 am
by Duncanthemonster
Fearghus wrote:I'll agree that SCA fighting is more "sporty" than other martial endeavors, but to say that unless you are locked in mortal combat, you're not doing a martial art is just silly.
If what you are doing has applications to the real use of weapons, be fists or knives, you are practicing a martial art. If you look at 19th century French cane fighting techniques, many SCA strikes directly correspond to the strikes shown. Since cane fighting was one of the ways a 19th cent gentleman was expected to defend himself, does that not make the techniques martial arts?
SCA combat is what it is. I like the free form aspect of it. Given some simple parameters, I can do what I want. I'd like a little more shield contact and body to body contact, but I can live with it the way it is.
Fearghus, what I am saying is that if the end result is survive real 'mortal' combat. Most, if not all, modern martial arts are geared toward a different aim. Not acutal fighting. I love Martial Arts...I am a huge fan of them...but if your goal is to win a game, tourney or hell even Pennsic...it's a sport. You fight as your train...you train for your victory conditions.
SCA, kempo, karate, Tae-k, hell, even boxing...it's a game because your victory conditions are pre determined and artificial. Victory in a true Martial Battle(wheter it is hand to hand, weapon and armor, or bullets and bombs) is decided but either killing your enemy, or driving them from the opjective in must cases. Not three blows, not called shots, not tapping out.
I am not knocking on SCA, or anyother martial art/game...hell I am even willing to call them Martial arts.....just not Arts. Am I making any sense?

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:53 am
by Dagonet
all the activities beind described as sports are sports. More importantly though they are a form of training for real combat, though perhaps styalized a bit. Just because someone has never used what they practice to kill someone does not make them less of a practitioner. The power does not come from killing someone but rather from knowing how...or more importantly in knowing how to avoid having to.
By your logic though, saying that anything that results in death is a martial art, a bar room brawl could be a martial art...or going and getting your gun out of your glove box and shooting someone is a martial art. If I shoot him, he dies, and im a martial artist? That just doesn't jive to me.
Examine strip fencing for a moment. It is very much a sport. It is very much styled to the rules. Those rules were initially created to teach the use of a sword. To say that now, in the year 2005, a strip fencer couldn't apply his abilities to a real weapon and use it to efectively and efficiently dispose of someone is just silly.
Though SCA fighting was not designed to be training for real sword combat, the game we play is not a new one...at all. I feel confident that after my 8 years of heavy fighting that if I were placed in a life threating situation and I had a real sword, or even a stick, I would be able to meet that situation properly.
In a real fight the winner is the one that deaded the other...in practice/play/game/sport the winner is the one that beat the other...in a way that in real life the loser would have died. Before it is said I know that armor standards and blow convention are not the most realistic....blah blah blah. Point being, the purely physical aspects of SCA combat, much like many other eastern martial arts, have application in real fighting scenerios.
All of this completely neglects the internal aspects of the activity.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:55 am
by Sir Guy
ahem........being one of the knights in the area (Japan) Aaron speaks of.
I would say that Sir Rob and myself fight for more then just to win. I will not speak for my brother however I fight for different things at different times....My King, the smile of the ladies favor I am wearing, the crowd, to teach, the honor of facing someone on the field and besting them in either single combat or war, many other reasons as well. The shear joy I get from all if the above. But hey, I am a knight and that is what knights do.
I see it as both an Art and a Sport.
With Repsect,
Sir Guy
<<But, that being said there is both sport and art in SCA heavy fighting. I fight for my lady and the crowd, and frankly I’m putting on a show…so I’m a Martial Artist. My local KSCAs fight to win, so they fight in a Martial Sport. We’re both in the same ring, with different objectives, but it’s still fun. >>
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:17 am
by Duncanthemonster
Dagonet wrote:all the activities beind described as sports are sports. More importantly though they are a form of training for real combat, though perhaps styalized a bit. Just because someone has never used what they practice to kill someone does not make them less of a practitioner. The power does not come from killing someone but rather from knowing how...or more importantly in knowing how to avoid having to.
ME>>
That is my Point....sport is sport...even based on an Art. I will agree with you on every point you make here.
>>
By your logic though, saying that anything that results in death is a martial art, a bar room brawl could be a martial art...or going and getting your gun out of your glove box and shooting someone is a martial art. If I shoot him, he dies, and im a martial artist? That just doesn't jive to me.
ME>>
No...I mostly agree with you again. The result is not the key. The result you train for is. A Soldier in the US Army is a Martial Artist. A Paintballer is a Martial Sports Player. They have similar skilsets, and one can tranfer to the other...the focus and mindset are the key.
>>
Examine strip fencing for a moment. It is very much a sport. It is very much styled to the rules. Those rules were initially created to teach the use of a sword. To say that now, in the year 2005, a strip fencer couldn't apply his abilities to a real weapon and use it to efectively and efficiently dispose of someone is just silly.
ME<<
Agreed...a strip fencer is highly skilled(defently more so than I)because he is highly trained...but could he win against someone who as equally trained not to win strip fenceing, but to survive a real sword fight for their life?
>>
Though SCA fighting was not designed to be training for real sword combat, the game we play is not a new one...at all. I feel confident that after my 8 years of heavy fighting that if I were placed in a life threating situation and I had a real sword, or even a stick, I would be able to meet that situation properly.
ME<<
Again...so might a paintballer in a firefight...if they could acutal shoot a person dead. That is the hard part. the Army trains it's troops on a man shaped moving target, not a bullseye....ever wonder why?
>>
In a real fight the winner is the one that deaded the other...in practice/play/game/sport the winner is the one that beat the other...in a way that in real life the loser would have died. Before it is said I know that armor standards and blow convention are not the most realistic....blah blah blah. Point being, the purely physical aspects of SCA combat, much like many other eastern martial arts, have application in real fighting scenerios.
ME<<
Agree...not the physical I am saying make it a sport.
>>
All of this completely neglects the internal aspects of the activity.
ME>>
No..I disagree here..that is my point. The internal aspects are, to me, the defining differences.
>>
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:38 am
by Duncanthemonster
Good Sir Guy,
I too, fight for many of the same reasons.
An I hope that All who fight in the SCA do as well, with half the mesure of joy it has brought me to do so...however..it is as you say. You are a Knight.
Your Game and mine are different.
I am a soldier. I am a warfighter.
I was trained to think a different way.
By my father, by the Army, and by my life experinces.
I have never, nor will I try to say the SCA, and all it stands for is nothing but a trival game or sport.
It is based, as best we can, on a form of fighting as true as any that have ever been, or will ever be.
But it's not that form.
It is an artifiacal construct that alows us to 'play' at it, within an contrived set of parameters. It can be, in it's way, as 'true' as anything Art or Sport...but it is not "real".
Sir Guy wrote:ahem........being one of the knights in the area (Japan) Aaron speaks of.
I would say that Sir Rob and myself fight for more then just to win. I will not speak for my brother however I fight for different things at different times....My King, the smile of the ladies favor I am wearing, the crowd, to teach, the honor of facing someone on the field and besting them in either single combat or war, many other reasons as well. The shear joy I get from all if the above. But hey, I am a knight and that is what knights do.
I see it as both an Art and a Sport.
With Repsect,
Sir Guy
<<But, that being said there is both sport and art in SCA heavy fighting. I fight for my lady and the crowd, and frankly I’m putting on a show…so I’m a Martial Artist. My local KSCAs fight to win, so they fight in a Martial Sport. We’re both in the same ring, with different objectives, but it’s still fun. >>
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:21 am
by Sir Guy
Good Sir,
I am not sure I catch your point.
I think I do understand your point about training. I'm an active duty infantry officer that his been stationed in Korea and the 82nd Airborne Division. I also recently returned from six months in Iraq. So I think I do understand training somewhat and the differnces between what we do and what war is and how to prepare for each.
I was also an Atlantian squire during much of my molding perod in the SCA so I understand about training in the SCA be it for War or the Tourney field. I have yet to visit a kingdom that brings that kind of intensity to what they do (be it good or bad), and I have lived and fought in many of them, I am talking kingdom as a whole, not sperate practices or areas.
I am not sure which of your buttons I pressed, I truely did not mean to do so, as I was really justy replying to my friend Aaron's post.
Sir Guy
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:49 am
by Aaron
Sir Guy wrote:ahem........being one of the knights in the area (Japan) Aaron speaks of.
Please accept my apologies -- it was meant to be in no way a slight against your honor or skill. I oversimplified.
My viewpoint is that I tend to be a ham, and fight for the goofy fun of my lady and the crowd, and you tend to train hard and perfect technique so that you can excel in the sport.
Without an audience, I don't really enjoy it as much. For you, Sir Guy, you would be happy with or without an audience -- you are skilled enough to impress yourself sometimes. I'm not skilled enough to do anything but embarass myself...but often the crowd doesn't know that.
It's like comparing a Medieval Times Jouster to a World Championship Jouster...or a Hollywood Fight Stuntman to a Professional Boxer.
There is Art and Sport...and we all have combinations of both.
Please accept my apology.
-Aaron
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 5:35 am
by Murdock
It is a martial sport.
It is a sport based loosely on medieval armoured combat. It has rules, a defined winner and otehr such elements.
IE it is like Judo to Jui Jitsu or Kendo to kenjitsu. Being a sport does not negate any legitimacy to abilities of the fighters. A pro boxer is definately a formitible fighter even though he is trained in a martial sport.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:06 am
by AllenJ
My .05
It's not a martial art.
Reasoning: Even though we cannot train to the extent where we actually do kill someone- there has to be the understanding that the techniques used are being done in order to maim/kill your opponent.
I've seen the argument over and over that 'well, my knight is big and buff and if he had his rattan stick he could come over to your house and kill you and your dad...' I do not find this valid as you could take virtually any item and kill someone with it. Pencil, wrench, chair, big rock, pushing someone down the stairs, ect. The SCA, and the techniques used by the majority of the people within it, have never been meant to be anything other that a way to "score a point" or your opponent. Granted there are people that are trying to bring more historical techniques into it. I feel though that as long as you are "keeping score" there will always be more emphasis on getting the touch as opposed to doing a real martial technique right.
i spent many years doing sport fencing thinking I was doing swordplay. Only after more research did I figure out that this was not remotley close to what real swordplay was like. I called my foils, "weapons" --I considered it a very valid martial art. But after figuring out what really went on and how it was done, there was no fooling myself. Olympic style fencing is a sport- not a martial art. Though much different tools and rules apply to the SCA, I put it in the same category as sport fencing and kendo and the like. It is a sport/game loosley based of a martial theme. It is not a legitimate form of self defence.
(EDIT) Just found a great article on this topic on the ARMA site:
http://www.thearma.org/essays/MartialAr ... tSport.htm
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:09 am
by Duncanthemonster
Sir Guy,
You never pushed my button. Really, my post was simply an honest response to your's. I Never ever never ment my reply as anything but a continueing of the conversation. I promise you, I in no way ment any slight to you. I was trying to explain my POV is all. You have much of the same background as I it sounds.....only more so. I hope that at some point in the future you might consider me a friend as well.
Again..I am sorry if my post came off the wrong way. Damn inflectionless medium....

.
Murdock and AllenJ,
You both state my POV better than I have I think...

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:28 am
by Stefan ap Llewelyn
My opinion:
I was tought a martial art was a skill tought to the army for use in war. Which makes things like Ju Jitsu a martial art but not western boxing.
If you are training to use medieval weaponry then you are training in a martial art whether you train with a competitive objective or a self defence objective or a meditative objective is a seperate issue.
Based on this reasoning I would say that SCA is a martial art.
P.S. I do not do SCA I only do non competitive steel re-enactment.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:17 am
by cadogan
I think it depends on your mindset. I studied Tae Kwon Do for a while, and while this is commonly considered a martial art, during competition, you could only "score" to the torso or head. Of course my instructor told me in a real fight, you never need to kick above the waist, and usually not above the knee, and yet still we trained with lots of cool spinning kicks to the head, etc. So, is it now
not a martial art? I'm not sure I know the answer...
However, the techniques learned in the SCA such as throwing your hip into a shot, targeting, etc. could certainly be put to use with any weapon and/or club. Sure, we don't target hands, or knees, or other places, but that doesn't mean in the proper situation that we
couldn't. Sure, we fight with rattan sticks, but if you were jumped in an alley and snatched up a peice of pipe or a broken 2X4, wouldn't the training you receive in the SCA benefit you as much as someone who trained in TKD? We have all seen new people show up and try swinging a stick, and it's not something that just anyone can do with any skill. Therefore, in a sense, are we not training to fight? And isn't that the defination of a martial art?
Interesting topic!

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:34 am
by Cathal O'Ruarc
Hold on, people! We are getting our terms mixed up now.
Where I'm coming from: 1st Dan in TKD, 17 years of training, teaching and tournaments. (BTW: Whoever thinks Tae Kwon Do is anything less than a martial art had better do some period research into medieval Korea. Or contact me.

)
SCA fighting is a
martial art. Look at the words that make up the term: (dictionary.com)
Martial:
1. Of, relating to, or suggestive of war.
2. Relating to or connected with the armed forces or the profession of arms.
3. Characteristic of or befitting a warrior.
Art: (relevent definitions)
1. A system of principles and methods employed in the performance of a set of activities: the art of building.
2. A trade or craft that applies such a system of principles and methods: the art of the lexicographer.
3. Skill that is attained by study, practice, or observation: the art of the baker; the blacksmith's art.
Now, considering the above, how do we
apply it? Since we choose NOT to kill each other, we have devised a "
sport" to best
apply what we have learned and to drive up our skill and technique against live opponents. This is true in TKD as well as SCA.
Sport:
1. Physical activity that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often engaged in competitively.
2. A particular form of this activity.
3. An activity involving physical exertion and skill that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often undertaken competitively.
So, in short, what do we and others not in the SCA see in the lists? A sport based on a martial art. What do you practice on your pell at home? A martial art.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:39 am
by Broadway
I suppose its all about situation.
All my training in boxing and Rattan fighting won't amount to a hill of beans if I'm accosted in an alley, and the guy mugging me has a gun.
I'm not about to reach down and see if I can find a stick, or get close enough to punch him... I'll more than likely throw my wallet on the ground in front of him, and hope he doesn't believe in the "no witnesses" thing.
But, if I were going home from the theater, and some guy tried to mug me with say a knife, and he was some distance away, and there was a stick of some sort handy... I would say I could take a guy with a knife.
Now if some guy for some stupid ass, unknown reason, who was trained in the art of western swordplay, and trained with real blades, attacked me in a blind alley... would I feel comfortable defending myself with my rattan training if just maybe the guy threw me a sword and said defend myself?
Yeah... like that's gonna happen.
The whole debate is pointless.
All it is going to do is offend people who believe one side or the other too strongly to admit the other side might have a point.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:47 am
by Gwydion Caithnes
cadogan wrote:Sure, we fight with rattan sticks, but if you were jumped in an alley and snatched up a peice of pipe or a broken 2X4, wouldn't the training you receive in the SCA benefit you as much as someone who trained in TKD?
I agree, but only to an extent. Some of our SCA training actually teaches us to AVOID certain target areas (for safety reasons, largely) that I would definately target if my life were in jeopardy. I'm not concerned about the safety of my opponent in a "real life stuation" requiring lethal force. But in the SCA, I hold the safety of my opponent in high regard. (Note: I didn't say "highest" regard...after all, I AM clubbing him/her with a freakin'
stick...

)
I think this entire thread hinges largely on semantics...or at least one's personal definition of "art." I have observed talented SCA fighters whose skill is such that it approaches a art form for me - I can appreciate/envy their talent, and aspire to it.
OTOH, I am among those who decry the increased emphasis on what I perceive as the competitive "sport" aspect of SCA combat, versus the underlying conventions of medieval recreation, authenticity, etc. But I don't want to hijack the thread...

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:51 am
by James B.
Here is my perspective
When I do Tang So Do in a studio that is a Martial art.
When I compete with a constrained set of rules that looks nothing like a real fight it is a sport.
When I practice sword fighting as it was really thought in the Middle Ages that is a martial art.
When I hit people with a club with a constrained set of rules that resembles nothing like real sword play in armor that is a sport.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:54 am
by cadogan
SCA fighting is a martial art. Look at the words that make up the term: (dictionary.com)
Martial:
1. Of, relating to, or suggestive of war.
2. Relating to or connected with the armed forces or the profession of arms.
3. Characteristic of or befitting a warrior.
Art: (relevent definitions)
1. A system of principles and methods employed in the performance of a set of activities: the art of building.
2. A trade or craft that applies such a system of principles and methods: the art of the lexicographer.
3. Skill that is attained by study, practice, or observation: the art of the baker; the blacksmith's art.
Now, considering the above, how do we apply it? Since we choose NOT to kill each other, we have devised a "sport" to best apply what we have learned and to drive up our skill and technique against live opponents. This is true in TKD as well as SCA.
Sport:
1. Physical activity that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often engaged in competitively.
2. A particular form of this activity.
3. An activity involving physical exertion and skill that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often undertaken competitively.
So, in short, what do we and others not in the SCA see in the lists? A sport based on a martial art. What do you practice on your pell at home? A martial art.
[/quote]
Much better said than my humble attempt!
Edited to add quotes by the technically challenged.
[/quote]
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:13 am
by James B.
If Fencing is a sport then SCA fighting has to be too. Both are a game based off of sword fighting and neither represents the weapons true military use.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:28 am
by Nissan Maxima
I think of SCA combat as a martial farce.
I mean, look at us... For the most part, overweight, dressed funny, pretending to be knights, samurai, conan the barbarian. Don't get me wong, I love this game. But art? Sorry.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:34 am
by Dagonet
It IS a sport. It is also a martial art. I never read where something can't be both.
James, if you want to run around and hit people with a club...you have fun with that. Personally, I take a bit more pride in my activity. If you do not believe that there is form, technique, strategy and style to be applied in SCA combat then you are fooling yourself. If anyone believes these things do not exist in SCA combat they have not examined the activity closely enough.
Come train with me for six months and we'll see what you say after that.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:35 am
by Sinister_Theo
I have studied martial art for several years. I have studied TKD, Aikido, and Brazilian Ju Jitsu. When I studied TKD the aim was tournament fighting and not a sense of defending oneself in a dangerous situation. In the other 2 I learned of physical defense, meditation, and philosphical traditions.
In my experience Martial Arts are devoted to the art of physical preservation amidst dangerous and life threatening situations. TKD and the SCA do not offer instruction in those matters. Sure if and SCA fighter was in an ally and found a steel bucket with holes, stick, and a garbage can lid they might be able to defend themselves from adversaries. But the SCA fighting is not about teaching self defense. There are few people in the SCA that are very talented and could perservere using skills the honed in the SCA. But that is not a reflection of the mass populas in the SCA that fights. The mass populas in that situation is not taught, in SCA fighting, how to deal with physical threatening situations.
The SCA is combat in a controlled environment where certain factors are considered to ensure the longevity of the society and its members.
It's goals represent a hobby to which some push its boundaries to extremes.
The SCA fighting is more a sport than anything. But why would that be a bad thing? I love football and most of those playing that pro-sport could pound most people into goo.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:45 am
by James B.
Dagonet wrote:Personally, I take a bit more pride in my activity. If you do not believe that there is form, technique, strategy and style to be applied in SCA combat then you are fooling yourself. If anyone believes these things do not exist in SCA combat they have not examined the activity closely enough.
You misunderstand me, never said there is not a skill to the sport I only said it is not the same as the skill to fight in real armor with a real sword. Any knight in the SCA can so kick my ass in the SCA but if I handed you a metal suit of armor and a rebatted sword and take away "kill/wound" rules the SCA plays by I have the advantage.
I fought against guys in the "as real men fought" tourny at Pennsic that would so beat me on the SCA feild and pushed them around because it's not thier trained environment but I train like that in HWMA.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:47 am
by Kilkenny
Duncanthemonster wrote:Anything where the outcome is death.
The forms of fighting, whereever they come from, where ment to damage people. When you spar in any form...it's a game.
A game Based on a Martial Art...not the art it's self.
let me try and make that more clear.
lets say there was the Anceint Art of Ku-Fu-Ka...a graceful, yet brutal way of turning people into chuncky salsa used in the XXth century in Uberfarastain by local fisherman....now a days, the only folks who know anything about it meet at strip malls and swat at each other with padded fish.
The have judges, a rule makeing body, and a ranking system.
They hold twice yearly competions where the person who best swats all commers with a padded fish wins a bowl of pickled eggs.
Is that a Martial Art? I see it as a sport based on a Martial Art...but it's a sport now.
Can it be reto-fitted from sport to Art? Yup...as soon as fish are once agian the ultimite weapon. Can the practicioers of the modern sport claim to understand what those wise fisherman knew? In a distant no life or death way...sure. Truly...nope.
Does a guy who has never served in the Military, and been in an acutal firefight know what it is like...because he's played HALO? or paintball?
Paintball is very similar to small unit fireteam action....but it ain't "for real"
Done both...not the same thing...similar in many respects, but not the same.
Make any sense?
mmm.. no. (grin) As I read your reasoning here, there are no martial arts practised in the USA, at least not above ground, because to be a martial art you have to be actually, intentionally, maiming and killing people...
It seems to me you're applying an unreasonable definition. OTOH, I can see the point that there is a distinction to be made between a martial art and a martial sport.
Now, as an example of the differences, I might point to Kendo versus Aido, or Olympic Fencing versus various "historical" rapier styles. The one is clearly a sport, with strict rules, scoring methods and standards that relate not so much to practical use of the weapon as to a ritualized and stylized interpretation of combat - they are now sports, with a martial element to them. The other is a martial art - a system of training a person for combat and actually contain (or certainly should contain) an element of making the tudent understand that what they are learning involves violence and harm to other human beings.
I don't think you have to be *doing* actual harm for it to be a martial art - which is what I read in your posts. If I misunderstood, forgive me.
As to which SCA fighting is - it's a sport, with strong martial elements, but not really what I would call a martial art.
Gavin
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:59 am
by Dagonet
James B. wrote:
Any knight in the SCA can so kick my ass in the SCA but if I handed you a metal suit of armor and a rebatted sword and take away "kill/wound" rules the SCA plays by I have the advantage.
I'd take that bet. It's not about training to fight with a stick so much as it is training to fight. After 6 years of heavy fighting I picked up a sport epee and within a couple of months was doing quite well with it. Part of that is because I have a great coach. Part of it is because i know how to fight. I don't really care what I am fighting with, the principles of body, mind and spirit exist equally in all challenges of arms. The purpose of that challenge is irrelevent. If you learn to swing a stick, then that is what you will know. If you train yourself to win a fight, that is what you will know. Rattan combat or any other form of sport=training=martial art is completely worthless if you are not improving yourself.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:01 am
by Maelgwyn
Is it time for this discussion again?
To get beyond "Is! Is not! Is too!" you will need to offer widely accepted definitions of the terms you are using. Good luck with that. If you cannot agree on what the terms mean, how could you agree on which term is best for SCA combat?
I suspect that the ultimate difference between a martial sport and a martial art comes down to what is taking place in the mind of the participant. Is he preparing for lethal combat? Perfecting his form and style? Scoring points? Impressing the crowd? In any group of 3 fighters you may find all 4 of these approaches, regardless of whether they have met in a dojo, a salle des armes, or Duke Siggy's back yard. I think that the SCA offers combat activities that can be pursued as a martial art, sport, callisthenics, improvisational theatre, experimental archaeology, role-playing game or dating club as the individual chooses or the mood strikes.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:05 am
by jester
As I said on the other thread: I think this boils down to a question of intent on the part of each individual. Are you treating it as a martial sport or as a martial art? I have met folks from both camps and, in my opinion, the majority of SCA Rattan combat participants fall into the martial sport category. I would also argue that the balance of the evidence I have seen indicates to me that the SCA (the corporate body) believes this to be a martial sport. But that's just my opinion.