Jeff J wrote:Winterfell wrote:I will be helping out with the Emprise. As a herald, marshal, attendent, whatever.
Yeah, you do a great job at public announcement. It would be a loss if you weren't fighting though.
You are also good at knowing what was done at tourneys. I have a question for you on that: would there be other contests for the non-nobles at tourneys? I seem to recall squire's battles and the like as entertainments. Holding a few of those would flesh out the event since there are likely only going to be a few well-kittted full plate fellows. There could be a few combats of equally-authentic lighter-armored men. And what of archery?
Well I am going to try to get a kit up to snuff to fight, but failing that I do want to still do some field work.
There were specific tournies for squires only. And I have to check but I recall certain melees where either men at arms helped fight, or they jumped into the fray to get their knight/lord out. Right now I am thinking that that was an earlier practice, but I could be wrong.
It would also depend on the tournament itself. Most of them were carnival like atmospheres with several days of tournaments, and nights of drinking and debauchery. (Pretty much what Pennsic is) There would not be any archery short of shooting at the butts. However a couple of things that can be worked in are: In between or before the main event:
Judicial duel between two non nobles. Merchants, widow and murderer, that sort of thing.
Judicial duel between two nobles. That could be done a number of ways. Such as described in "The Last Duel", but without horses.
Honour duels between two nobles. Usually not to the death. But the loser gets thrown over and out of the ring at the end.
Prowess duels (for lack of the proper term right now) where at the end both combatants walk out of the ring arm in arm.
And of course there is always the morality plays that were done on the sides or in betweens.
Hey can we get some kids to be "urchins" and "cut purses"?
