Pistol Combat Crossbow?

For those of us who wish to talk about the many styles and facets of recreating Medieval armed combat.
Will Spicer
New Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: Smoking Rocks
Contact:

Post by Will Spicer »

Winterfell wrote:I am holding out for a gatling ballista.
:twisted:


You mean a Cho-ko-nu? The chinese mounted big ones on castle walls and rained death on persons :lol:
I'd Rather Die Free Than Live Safe
User avatar
Robert of Canterbury
Archive Member
Posts: 2169
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Salisbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Robert of Canterbury »

Oskar der Drachen wrote:
Winterfell wrote:I am holding out for a gatling ballista.
:twisted:


There is actually historical precedent (at least in design specs) for a chain driven ballista. Greek Vintage.
.


Demetrios Poliorketes? I think he's the chap you are thinking of..
"Proecce ne Suffit" - Prowess is not enough

Work: https://www.bespokepewter.com
Words: http://forsooth.pbworks.com
Pewter research: http://pbsn3.pbworks.com
Baron Alcyoneus
Archive Member
Posts: 39578
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:00 pm

Post by Baron Alcyoneus »

freiman the minstrel wrote:Really, it seems like the modern grips would be a problem.

But, if you skipped the pistol grip, and you carefully crafted it, it doesn't seem like much of a problem.

Medieval crossbows came in a very wide variety of shapes and sizes.

If you made couple of medieval styled crossbows, who would care?

f


I think I've seen at least one pic in a manuscript (Spanish, 12thC???) of a pistol gripped xbow... :?
User avatar
Oskar der Drachen
Archive Member
Posts: 2819
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:35 pm
Location: Lochac - New Zealand

Post by Oskar der Drachen »

Robert of Canterbury wrote:
Oskar der Drachen wrote:
Winterfell wrote:I am holding out for a gatling ballista.
:twisted:


There is actually historical precedent (at least in design specs) for a chain driven ballista. Greek Vintage.
.


Demetrios Poliorketes? I think he's the chap you are thinking of..


That's a familiar name. I've never had the book, (translation from greek) but I have had the book from a good library and at one point (darn it) photocopies of the relevant pages. It was the same book that describes the gas-pressure ballista with nested airtight cylinders that compress to provide the motive force.

All a bit far from the point though.

The issues I see with a short-stock crossbow have been covered, but I can add some ballistics knowledge too.

Time Under Acceleration TUA is what gives a string driven projectile both the velocity and the accuracy for a good flight. Combined with ballistics, a balance of the length of the shot (head)40/60(tail) distribution gives a bolt/arrow/spear the weight distribution for a smooth arc. Fletching just improves this, a properly balanced shot doesn't really need fletches.

If your groove and string travel are too short you are just slapping the shot into action, just like a croquet ball BANG and go, you have to depend on the attrubutes of the projectile itself for a smooth flight, there is no time for guidance. That's why a rifle has better accuracy than a pistol, basic stuff. It's also why a bullet has to be spun for accuracy. No length of the projectile for a ballistic weighting is possible.

Back to a pistol crossbow. the first thing to do is design your ammunition. If you can make a good ballistically stable short arrow that conforms to the rules of the game, build the shortest crossbow that can fire it. Build the point of the arrow, then build shorter and shorter shafts while still being able to throw it properly without it tumbling.

The prod of the bow will be important too. A recurve prod will be able to have a longer draw with a smaller profile. Meaning that because of the shape of the bow, the length of the prod (laying a stright ruler from tip to tip) for the same overall length a recurved shape will give a longer draw (guided TUA) than a simple curve, leading to better accuracy.

Shape of the stock you can play with too. Are you familiar with a Bullpup design of a rifle? The magazine/bolt/firing chamber is behind the grip leading to a shorter overall length.

If you make your crossbow so that you can hold it in the middle of the stock by widening the centre and narrowing the back, you could place the trigger in the middle instead of at the back, leading to a longer groove and better TUA for the overall length of the weapon. You could also then get away from the ruling against a "pistol-grip". I'll see if I can sketch what I'm talking about and attach it to a reply here.

Points to consider then

1. Stable ammunition
2. Recurve prod
3. Bullpup design with a longer groove/draw
4. Trigger in the middle, latch at the rearmost possible position

careful of the fingers yes?

So in the added picture, you would put a great fat stock segment under the middle of the tiller, and the trigger would be there. The groove would extend over this to the rear of the stock increasing the length of the groove. Most of the length of a traditional crossbow is lost to the tiller, decreasing accuracy of the weapon. TUA again. The more time you spend accelerating and guiding the bolt, the better and more accurate the round will be. Better to justify carrying the thing to begin with yes?
Attachments
Short-stock crossbow.JPG
Short-stock crossbow.JPG (5.99 KiB) Viewed 129 times
Ignorance is Fixable

Contrary to popular thought, life does not hinge around big decisions at crisis points, but small everyday decisions that lead almost inexorably to crisis. Virtue lies in not being lazy when choosing, even in a small way.
Clinker
Archive Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Denver, USA

Post by Clinker »

Ok, Oskar, you build a Bullpup crossbow, and you will shoot it in the open class of the IAU (International Armbrustschutzen Union). Because you sure aren't going to be able to shoot it at SCA events, since it will not be even close to a period weapon design.
You will also find that, like pistol shooting versus rifle shooting, your accuracy is far less than with a shoulder-fired weapon. Leaving the short sight radius alone, the weight distribution for one handed fire is problematic, especially if a stirrup is used for cocking. Further, I cannot wait to see the look on your face the first time you bring the butt end with the roller nut close to your aiming eye, and pull your mustache off when the bowstring is released.

Pistol crossbows are, and always have been TOYS. Often expensive toys that showcase the creativity of their builders. Not secret assassin weapons, but TOYS.

While I applaud your obvious design enthusiasm, I think you are designing a solution in search of a problem.
"Perdicaris alive, or Raisuli dead." The slogan of a confident Western culture.
Baron Alcyoneus
Archive Member
Posts: 39578
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:00 pm

Post by Baron Alcyoneus »

I was thinking about that a day or two ago...

Henry VIII and other Renaissance princes would pay for all sorts of expensive toys, that no one else had, just for the novelty. After all, all the Cool Monarchs had them. ;) Folding polearms, swords with spring loaded blades that would shoot out, spring loaded buttspikes concealed in the hilt of a sword... So why not a miniature pistol xbow?


AAOTMK shows a crossbow with a full size stock/prod, but only enough room for the hand above the trigger.
Vypadni z mého trávník!

Does loyalty trump truth?

"If they hurt you, hurt them back. If they kill you, walk it off."- Captain America
Uadahlrich
Archive Member
Posts: 787
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:15 am
Location: Barony of fenix, Middle Kingdom(Northern, KY)
Contact:

Post by Uadahlrich »

Cian of Storvik wrote:Here's a 17th century type. It would be so cute to see on the field of combat! And I would tell the person that just before I smash them in the face with my mace.

But seriously, they wouldn't be legal in Atlantia, and I doubt any Kingdom except perhaps rapier melee, where they are allowed to have pistols. (and then you could probably shoot only rubberbands/tubes).
-Cian


"Nowhere on MY listfield."

Midrealm Kingdom Rapier Marshal
Uadahlrich
Archive Member
Posts: 787
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:15 am
Location: Barony of fenix, Middle Kingdom(Northern, KY)
Contact:

Post by Uadahlrich »

Will Spicer wrote:
Winterfell wrote:I am holding out for a gatling ballista.
:twisted:


You mean a Cho-ko-nu? The chinese mounted big ones on castle walls and rained death on persons :lol:


They even used them during the Japanese invasion in the 1930s
Tibbie Croser
Archive Member
Posts: 2373
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 4:09 pm
Location: Storvik, Atlantia

Post by Tibbie Croser »

From the Tod's Stuff link I posted on the previous page of the thread: "These [latchet crossbows} were small powerful bows with an inbuilt cocking lever. This allowed for easy loading even on horse back and a rapid rate of shooting. This example was about 250lb with a bow length of 35 cm (14"). This example was £1,400 and supplied with 3 hand made bolts."

A closeup of the cocking lever:
http://www.todsstuff.co.uk/galpics/pages/Cocking%20lever%20from%2016th%20C%20latchet%20crossbow_JPG.php

This reproduction crossbow is indeed short (14"), but I don't know if people on this thread would consider it a miniature or toy. Draw weight is given as 250 lbs. I don't know how that translates into inch-pounds. Not sure if these bows in period were intended purely as hunting bows or were also used as combat bows for light cavalry or raiders, e.g., the border reivers.

I'd be tickled to have an SCA version of the latchet for rapier CA or target archery, especially since my persona is a Scottish Borderer. I suppose the shorter range and lower power would balance the ease of use.

For comparison, what size were the recurve bows used by Eastern mounted archers? How would an SCA combat archery latchet crossbow compare with an SCA combat archery Eastern horsebow for size, power, and effectiveness?
Flittie Smeddum of Dagorhir
Tibbie Croser of the SCA
User avatar
AEiric Orvender
Archive Member
Posts: 2849
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: Vine Grove Ky.

Post by AEiric Orvender »

Clinker wrote:I would like to introduce the notion that all MALE Combat Archers must FIRST authorize in at least two heavy weapon forms, AND fight in a minimum number of tourneys/wars BEFORE authorizing in missile weapons.


Well I know here in the Middle any CA must be authroized in heavy before getting their CA Auth.
Squire to Sir Diglach mac Cein

"Eliminating Generi-celts from the Midrealm, one at a time. By Education or Force." -Sir Diglach mac Cein

"I'm not trying to be a hero! I'm fighting the dragon!" -Sir William the Knight
User avatar
Nissan Maxima
Thor's Taint
Posts: 8170
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Ancestral Manor
Contact:

Post by Nissan Maxima »

Æiric Ørvender wrote:
Clinker wrote:I would like to introduce the notion that all MALE Combat Archers must FIRST authorize in at least two heavy weapon forms, AND fight in a minimum number of tourneys/wars BEFORE authorizing in missile weapons.


Well I know here in the Middle any CA must be authroized in heavy before getting their CA Auth.

Nope. A member of the chivalry can sponsor you directly into your CA authorization.
I am the SCA's middle finger.
www.clovenshield.org
User avatar
AEiric Orvender
Archive Member
Posts: 2849
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: Vine Grove Ky.

Post by AEiric Orvender »

Nissan Maxima wrote:Well I know here in the Middle any CA must be authroized in heavy before getting their CA Auth.

Nope. A member of the chivalry can sponsor you directly into your CA authorization.[/quote]

Oh I thought that had changed. :?
Well I was wrong then, pardon me.
Squire to Sir Diglach mac Cein

"Eliminating Generi-celts from the Midrealm, one at a time. By Education or Force." -Sir Diglach mac Cein

"I'm not trying to be a hero! I'm fighting the dragon!" -Sir William the Knight
User avatar
Vitus von Atzinger
Archive Member
Posts: 14039
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Louisville, Ky. USA

Post by Vitus von Atzinger »

Nissan Maxima wrote:
Leopold der Wolf wrote:Was it Nissan who said he wanted to strap a giant goon with a back mounted ballista? Oh god how awesome that would be. I just imagine this gigantic guy with Nissan riding on him piggy back waving a banner while he launches ballista bolts at wayward archers and spearmen.


The goon is very big, but I am too big to ride the goon. Maybe Vitus could ride him.


So I have avoided this thread because of it's obvious lameness, and yet I felt compelled to read it. Now I know why.
-V
"I am trying to be a great burden to my squires. The inner changes we look for will not take place except under the weight of great burdens."
-Me
User avatar
Oskar der Drachen
Archive Member
Posts: 2819
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:35 pm
Location: Lochac - New Zealand

Post by Oskar der Drachen »

Clinker wrote:Ok, Oskar, you build a Bullpup crossbow, and you will shoot it in the open class of the IAU (International Armbrustschutzen Union). Further, I cannot wait to see the look on your face the first time you bring the butt end with the roller nut close to your aiming eye, and pull your mustache off when the bowstring is released.

Pistol crossbows are, and always have been TOYS. Often expensive toys that showcase the creativity of their builders. Not secret assassin weapons, but TOYS.

While I applaud your obvious design enthusiasm, I think you are designing a solution in search of a problem.


Oh, I'm not serious about it, just playing with the idea. I like much larger toys than this. I am the guy who got an experimental weapon *specifically* banned by the SCA board though. I built a working SCA legal (technically) hand gonne using the Lochac water rocket conventional projectiles.

They didn't like the idea, sad to say.
Ignorance is Fixable

Contrary to popular thought, life does not hinge around big decisions at crisis points, but small everyday decisions that lead almost inexorably to crisis. Virtue lies in not being lazy when choosing, even in a small way.
Post Reply