Auction sites: minimum ethical standards?

For trading/Selling/and posting items that you need very badly.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ziad
Archive Member
Posts: 32152
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Burning to the Socket.
Contact:

Auction sites: minimum ethical standards?

Post by Ziad »

Or Caveat Emptor one hundred percent?

Carefully, even slimily wordsmithed description of item - if I had an original, perhaps 3 words different in the entire paragraph to describe item.

But it is new. Almost the same picture on another site, and obviously the same item, honestly describing same as new merchandise. Retail, volume site. The one on the auction site (NOT eBay) is even described as "restored and refinished to nearly new condition"...

How the hell can you take a new item, and "restore" it? This is lying. Not just misdirecting, lying. Should an honest auction site allow this kind of crap?

Opinions?


Z
losthelm
Archive Member
Posts: 12207
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 1:01 am
Location: albion NY half way between rochester/buffalo
Contact:

Post by losthelm »

Without knowing the auction it could be a miss print.
Like new is often used. paticularly if the packaging was damaged or a small cosmetic defect present. The place I worked spent a lot of time trying to accuratly discribe items and clean/test the equipment.
After a while the discriptions all start to look the same and detail can be lost paticularly if things need to be sorted/graded prior to listing.
A bit of polish or quality cleaner can solve a number of cosmetic problems.
Wilhelm Smydle in the SCA

My Ebay Listings
My ETSY
User avatar
Ziad
Archive Member
Posts: 32152
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Burning to the Socket.
Contact:

Post by Ziad »

Nope, no misprint. This is willful action. Plenty of chance to say that "this is a reproduction of - but they have specifically not done so. This is an absolutely unethical description of the object - it has only been available at retail since March, what kind of "restoration" are they doing?

It is a reproduction firearm, a muzzleloader, being passed off (almost) as a real antique. At over twice the retail of the original, as a minimum bid.

... ca.1770s, has been restored and refinished to nearly new condition. Fully functional, too...


and

Unmarked (mkgs. worn away during repolishing.)


These, when it is known to them to be a modern reproduction, is (in my opinion) absolutely unethical.


Z
User avatar
Mike Garrett (Orc)
Archive Member
Posts: 7151
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 2:01 am
Location: Somerset, ENGLAND
Contact:

Post by Mike Garrett (Orc) »

You report it to the auction site. Been there, done that. They're normally on the ball for this sort of thing but can't police every auction, so they rely on honest citizens to report dodgy listings.
User avatar
Ziad
Archive Member
Posts: 32152
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Burning to the Socket.
Contact:

Post by Ziad »

Thanks, Mike.

I notified the original seller; evidently he has had problems with this guy before. I like the company; even more so now that the company president emailed me back on a Sunday morning with a very nice letter explaining what he would do.

So here is a link - nice stuff, 17c to 19c muzzleloaders:

http://www.middlesexvillagetrading.com/index.shtml


Z
losthelm
Archive Member
Posts: 12207
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 1:01 am
Location: albion NY half way between rochester/buffalo
Contact:

Post by losthelm »

That changes things quite a bit.
Paticularly with reproduction working fire arms.
Read the FAQ.
Wilhelm Smydle in the SCA

My Ebay Listings
My ETSY
Post Reply