13th Century Archer's Secondary Weapon?

To discuss research into and about the middle ages.

Moderator: Glen K

Post Reply
RenJunkie
Archive Member
Posts: 2487
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Contact:

13th Century Archer's Secondary Weapon?

Post by RenJunkie »

What would he have carried? A dagger, no doubt, but, a short sword? Small axe or hammer? How about a falchion?

Thanks!
Christopher
War kittens?!!!

"Born to lose. Live to win."

Historical Interpreter- Jamestown Settlement Museum
Master's Candidate, East Carolina University
Graduate of The College of William & Mary in Virginia
Cliff Rogers
Archive Member
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:15 am

Post by Cliff Rogers »

Thirteenth century Catalan crossbowmen usually had a big knife called a "mountain knife" or a short, thin sword (blade length about hip to knee). (Mott, _Sea Power_, 156-7) That was probably typical of others.
Cliff Rogers
RenJunkie
Archive Member
Posts: 2487
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Contact:

Post by RenJunkie »

Are there any extant examples of these, or good reconstructed drawings? Or even good period visual sources?

Thanks!
Christopher
War kittens?!!!

"Born to lose. Live to win."

Historical Interpreter- Jamestown Settlement Museum
Master's Candidate, East Carolina University
Graduate of The College of William & Mary in Virginia
edricus
Archive Member
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:43 pm
Location: Malmo Sweden, Drachenwald, Nordmark, Attemark
Contact:

Post by edricus »

I am rather sure that the billhook would have been a possibility as a utility tool in camp, not sure if it was used as a side arm. The larger cousin was used as a pole weapon and I do belive that one could do some serious harm with the small one as well.

http://www.toolnut.co.uk/products/billhooks
Fight like a unit
Die like a unit
Win like a unit

Hus Halfdan

Squire to Sir Vitus Polonius (the other Sir Vitus)
User avatar
EnglishSteel
Archive Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:10 am

Post by EnglishSteel »

Would depend entirely on the social status of the individual archer. Eatting knives were apparently the most widely used murder weapon in Medieval England according to By Sword and Fire so it makes sense that they would have been carried to battle too. Tools would have been grabbed and tucked into belts or carried along with them. Wood chopping axes, hammers, mauls, bills, anything they could get their hands on really. The more well to do may have had specific weapons as their sidearms, a falchion or a cheap sword probably.
Cliff Rogers
Archive Member
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:15 am

Post by Cliff Rogers »

RenJunkie wrote:Are there any extant examples of these, or good reconstructed drawings? Or even good period visual sources?

Thanks!
Christopher


I don't know if there are, but there's a famous fresco showing the crossbowmen. One reproduction is here (misidentified as "knights"): http://www.fanaticus.org/DBA/armies/IV68a/index.html

Cliff
Cliff Rogers
RenJunkie
Archive Member
Posts: 2487
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Contact:

Post by RenJunkie »

That's a cool link, Cliff. I poked around a bit under the armies link too...lol. Thanks!

OK, so basically, any hacky, whacky, or stabby item an archer could have afforded. That sounds pretty reasonable.

Thanks!
Christopher
War kittens?!!!

"Born to lose. Live to win."

Historical Interpreter- Jamestown Settlement Museum
Master's Candidate, East Carolina University
Graduate of The College of William & Mary in Virginia
User avatar
miscreant
Archive Member
Posts: 852
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: Iowa Falls, IA

Post by miscreant »

Some reports from Agincourt tell of Henry V's archers wading into the melee against the French men at arms and knights using the heavy wooden mallets they had used to pound the wooden stakes into the ground for protection with.
Ich Dien
Post Reply