"From Hunyadi to Rákóczi : war and society in late medieval and early modern Hungary / edited by János M. Bak, Béla K. Király"
-> I studied under Janos Bak, and know Bela quite well. This isn't for you, but it's interesting if institutional and economic histories are good for you.
"A History of Hungary : millennium in Central Europe / László Kontler"
-> Excellent. Too late for you. Kontler is a god.
"Hungarian society in the 9th and 10th centuries / by Antal Bartha ; [translated by K. Balázs] "
-> Don't know it. My wife says that it's dated, and you need to buy a copy of the catalog of the Hungarian national museum "The Conquest-Era Hungarians," which has a quick social history that is up to date (as well as lots of pretty bling-bling).
"The Magyars in the ninth century/Macartney, C. A." (This was written in 1930, so...)
-> ??
-> Probably awful.
"The Hungarians cross the Carpathians / István Dienes ; [translated by Barna Balogh ; revised by Paul Aston.]"
-> Good, but BADLY dated.
"Sons of Nimrod : the origin of Hungarians / by Anthony Endrey"
-> Complete and utter b.s.... avoid at all costs. Posits, based on bad historiography and worse linguistics, that the Hungarians are the descendants of the Sumerians. This bastard's work is worse than Daniken... I actually quit the magyar SCA list, partially because of some wench with "list princess" syndrome, but also b/c folks kept insisting that this thesis was legit, and I was tired of fighting about it.
I don't know anything about Hungarians or Magyars. The prof has structured his lecture around the idea that the three Carolingian kingdoms suffered a period of weakness in the 10th century from two sources- baronial in-fighting, and external pressure from the Spanish Muslims, Vikings and Magyars. I'm familiar with the Muslims in Spain and the Vikings, so I was a bit surprised to see him giving the Magyars, a people I'd heard little about, equal footing with these other two groups. I read Egfroth's excellent article and a couple other short articles online, and decided to pursue this a bit more.
The thing is, that the Magyars keep being portrayed as similar to the Mongols, whereas they're really much more like the Saxons... they were invited in to do weak peoples' dirty work, and then hung around longer and stronger than their employers hoped... most of these "raids" were actually a case of them being hired by one party to do in another.
I just submitted my electronic ILL request, so it should be here about 2007
If you're actually interested, screw that: go buy it. You'll learn more about Eastern Europe than you thought there was to know.