late14th/early15th century hauberk details

To discuss research into and about the middle ages.

Moderator: Glen K

Post Reply
Wyrm
Archive Member
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 2:01 am

late14th/early15th century hauberk details

Post by Wyrm »

Full length arms, circular neck hole, and reaching down to just past groin level. Now did they all have splits? I am thinking I would probably prefer not to have any splits but not sure if this will constrict much movement (I'm guessing it wont) but if splits are meant to be part were they at the sides or front or back centre (I've seen a lot of hauberks with fron splits but I think I'd prefer some groin coverage personally as this gear will be used for the assault). Please correct me on things if this description is off from how a hauberk should appear. Thanks.

Also, when measuring for hauberk size how much should I add for the absent gambeson?
Jeff J
Archive Member
Posts: 9181
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Adrift Just Off the Islets of Langerhans: Latitude N 39° 2' 55.3, Longitude W 104° 48' 50.4

Post by Jeff J »

You don't split a 14th/15th C. Mailshirt - you tailor it. At the waist, put in triangular expansion pieces to give it a flaired skirt. Likewise through the upper body- you expand it, especially at the back, to allow for shoulders.
BONANZA!!!
Wyrm
Archive Member
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 2:01 am

Post by Wyrm »

oh ok, never even thought of that. Do you know of any photos of hauberks made such a way that I can work out how they did them?
Konstantin the Red
Archive Member
Posts: 26713
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Port Hueneme CA USA

Post by Konstantin the Red »

Wyrm, ask and thou shalt receive; what's more, thy cup runneth over: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/trevor.barker/farisles/guilds/armour/mail.htm

Directions with illustrations and how-to for replicating a c. 1438 shirt of German provenance in the Wallace Collection, #A2. This is just such a shirt as Jeff J describes -- I should mention the "triangles", while one way to do it, are actually zones where expansions are placed in the weave, therefore perforce triangular. They would show up as areas where the linkrows rather gently bend as they pass through them.

For your chest measurement, figure your regular chest measurement plus ten inches -- this accommodates both aketon and doffing your shirt. You can also give your shirt some waist, and this is recommended, say, waist plus 12. You might go tighter as long as the waist isn't tighter than your chest plus your aketon when the mail at the waist is at full stretch. If it is tighter you're going to have an awful fight getting into your shirt.

By late fourteenth century, the full-on hauberk had obsolesced (many were likely cut up into smaller articles) and its compact, lightweight edition, the ha(u)burgeon, was beginning to fade also in favor of voiders, faulds, and mail standards, when our forebears came to realize just how efficient breasts-and-backs were at guarding their vitals. As the Wallace A2 shows, though, mailshirts continued to be made even though full harness of plate had stolen the show.

As a side note, those A-frame splits in hauberks in pics may be cured either by installation of right-triangle gussets, hypotenuses to centerline, on either side of the slit, or more subtly by putting an array of expansions in each half of the hauberks' skirts.
"The Minstrel Boy to the war is gone..."
Post Reply