Reference Books - Validity?

To discuss research into and about the middle ages.

Moderator: Glen K

Post Reply
User avatar
Kenwrec Wulfe
Archive Member
Posts: 4260
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

Reference Books - Validity?

Post by Kenwrec Wulfe »

Armour and Weapons in the Middle Ages by Charles H. Ashdown (undated)

and

Medieval Costume, Armour and Weapons Illustrated by Eduard Wagner and text by Zoroslava Drobna and Jan Durdik - Translated by Jean Layton


Good, bad?

Thanks!
Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but we rather have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit. -Aristotle
User avatar
Dave Womble
Archive Member
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Laconia, NH USA
Contact:

Post by Dave Womble »

The only negative thing I've heard about Ashdown, is that the work is extremely dated...many new theories and discoveries have come to light since it was first published...debunking some of what he's written. I believe Dan Howard still recomends it however.

No idea on the other one.

Dave
chef de chambre
Archive Member
Posts: 28806
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Nashua, N.H. U.S.
Contact:

Post by chef de chambre »

The second is modern artists drawings of 15th century pictures. They do a reasonable job of it. I am always in favour of going right to the source, but the fellow who wrote the section on horse-harness was a Polish cavalry officer with a ton of practical experience. It isn'tr a bad reference, if you keep in mind you are looking at someone elses interpretation of art.
Post Reply