Page 1 of 1
Portable Antiquities Scheme (Pictures of Old Stuff)
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:28 pm
by Jehan de Pelham
This link is the entirety of images in the British Library Portable Antiquities Scheme:
http://www.findsdatabase.org.uk/view/br ... t_prevpage
John
Jehan de Pelham, esquire and servant of Sir Vitus
www.mron.org
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:31 pm
by Klaus the Red
Good stuff. Someone bump this so I can bookmark it at home!
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 5:44 pm
by adamstjohn
Oh my goodness.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:30 am
by earnest carruthers
Nice one jehan.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:56 am
by Thomas H
I see your portable antiquities scheme and raise you some of the best objects on display in France.
http://www.photo.rmn.fr/c/htm/Home.aspx
best is, it's free and you can order (for cash) larger prints of various pieces.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:59 am
by Klaus the Red
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:06 am
by Karen Larsdatter
Not that I'm trying to contradict the possibility that people wore linen outerwear in the Middle Ages, but what evidence is there that this particular fragment
was used as high-end outer garment material (and not, say, part of a wall-hanging or some other function?)
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:07 am
by Klaus the Red
Here's another neat little thang. Great helm with a wrapper, Wisby-style gauntlets, sleeveless quilted coat worn on the outside, possible scale aventail...?
http://www.photo.rmn.fr/c/htm/CSearchZ.aspx?o=&Total=500&FP=22187633&E=22S39UL3EHTN&SID=22S39UL3EHTN&New=T&Pic=269&SubE=2C6NU0G8T5NQ
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:13 am
by Klaus the Red
what evidence is there that this particular fragment was used as high-end outer garment material (and not, say, part of a wall-hanging or some other function?)
You're right, it's not conclusive... but it does appear to shoot a hole in the general theory that expensive decorative fabrics (for people or objects) had to be wool or silk. There are so many factors at play that could explain its function: how much of the cost of this textile was fiber and how much weaving labor? Ie, was it significantly cheaper than a silk woven in the same pattern? Aside from cost, why use linen and not silk or wool? The advantage as clothing is obviously comfort- would it have held up better as a curtain, cushion covering, whatever? It's worth its own discussion, this one.
K
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:55 am
by earnest carruthers
Klaus
"ut it does appear to shoot a hole in the general theory that expensive decorative fabrics (for people or objects) had to be wool or silk"
by all accounts all fabrics were used, linen was very commonly used for wall hangings, altar cloths etc. Quite well documented as to restrictions on their painting by staynours.
Is there a general belief that hanging cloths etc were mostly linen or silk? it might well be the opposite. Banners, the few that surive and that are documented are mentioned as linen and silk (client and cost dependent).
But I am not mistaken the sample on your link says printed and Italian. This would tie in with Cennini (later) and his description of making false brocades by printing on cloth. Thanks for that link Klaus, it adds to my collection of printed cloth samples. Assuming the trans is correct.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:31 am
by Klaus the Red
Printed- missed that, good to know. Mighty intricate printing! That puts a whole new light on it. Thanks for the additional info re: wall hangings, etc.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:18 am
by earnest carruthers
No, thank you sir!
Yes it is finely printed stuff.
There is a large 14thC printed textile the sion textile historisches museum basel is in two or three parts (ie in separate collections), black and red block printing, linen etc. Huge too. Can't find any images on line, although it is in print.
I have a bit of info about cloth painters, thanks to Gwen as it happens, am willing to share it if you want.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:22 am
by Klaus the Red
Sure, bring it on.

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:57 am
by earnest carruthers
It has been brung, check the old PM.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:09 pm
by Klaus the Red
http://www.photo.rmn.fr/c/htm/CSearchZ.aspx?o=&Total=12&FP=22346304&E=22S39ULM15SN&SID=22S39ULM15SN&New=T&Pic=4&SubE=2C6NU00UZR69
Another neat little item- a very period use for leftover bits of fancy fabric! The fabric itself appears to be a cotton-silk blend, and the pattern seems woven.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:52 pm
by Jehan de Pelham
" I see your portable antiquities scheme and raise you some of the best objects on display in France.
http://www.photo.rmn.fr/c/htm/Home.aspx "
Hot damn, Thomas! More material culture Pr0n than you can shake a stick at!
John
Jehan de Pelham, esquire and servant of Sir Vitus
www.mron.org
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:11 pm
by Thomas H
I know, between that, the web gallery of art, the BIldindex and the Portbale antiquities scheme, there's a S**T load of stuff about!
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:36 pm
by Alcyoneus
grimstone bar wrote:Yes it is finely printed stuff.
There is a large 14thC printed textile the sion textile historisches museum basel is in two or three parts (ie in separate collections), black and red block printing, linen etc. Huge too. Can't find any images on line, although it is in print.
I have a bit of info about cloth painters, thanks to Gwen as it happens, am willing to share it if you want.
I know that there was a large industry in 15th C Italy for printing on cloth.
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:24 am
by earnest carruthers
Alcyoneus have you any sources to point me to?
I am aware of cloth printing there from one primary source, Cennini plus the few surviving pieces mostly seem to be Italian*, the Sion textile is apparently, but not aware of the extent in the middle ages.
* there is a Flemish printed and coloured textile at the V and A.
thanks