I'm reading Las Siete Partidas, the legal code compiled by Alfonso X, and I'm rapidly becoming fascinated with aspects other than the ones I ILLed the books for. The document (which fills 7 fairly large volumes) essentially lays out the legal code and includes explanations for terms and the legal theory behind the codes. The rule of the Emperor and the King is both explained and justified. What was truly fascinating to me was that neither the rule of the Emperor or the King was justified by divine will. Both of them exist in order to regulate society for the betterment of every citizen. Protecting the faith (Catholic Christianity) is one of the duties of the monarchs, but it is the last duty enumerated.
I'll be honest in saying that I am stunned to see this occurring in the thirteenth Century. This is a philosophy that I would have attributed to the Renaissance at the earliest and, more likely, the Age of Enlightenment. Sure, the Greeks had all of this, but the Middle Ages?
The more I learn, the less I find I know.
