A doubt concerning maille and voiders
A doubt concerning maille and voiders
A doubt just leaped in my mind: During the XV° century, we see for a certain time, italian armours with maille short sleeves under the pauldron but over the arm harness, but how they protected the inside of the elbow and in early times the biceps? Did they use voiders for their arms? If this is the case the armpit would be protected with 2 layers of maille?
If this is how they did it, how do you avoid the maille to lock over eachother binding movements?
If this is how they did it, how do you avoid the maille to lock over eachother binding movements?
- Sean Powell
- Archive Member
- Posts: 9908
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 1:01 am
- Location: Holden MA
Well I'm not certain of the question and I'm not experienced enough to guess at answers. Do you have specific suits in mind or artwork you can link to for reference?
I THINK that maile in the elbow disappears from use before it does so from armpits and I THINK that is roughly contemporary with elbow wings that wrap all the way to the inside but I would have to look at a number of suits just to see if there is a positive corelation in dates.
Having voiders that cover the armpit and yet pass over the rearbrace does not imply that there can't be maile sewn to the foundation cloting at the elbows... just that it is a seperate piece. A lot of that is going to be dictated by fashion as much as function.
Have you thought to also check for maile in other locations (groin, back of knees, neck) that might give a clue?
Sorry I can't be more help.
Sean
I THINK that maile in the elbow disappears from use before it does so from armpits and I THINK that is roughly contemporary with elbow wings that wrap all the way to the inside but I would have to look at a number of suits just to see if there is a positive corelation in dates.
Having voiders that cover the armpit and yet pass over the rearbrace does not imply that there can't be maile sewn to the foundation cloting at the elbows... just that it is a seperate piece. A lot of that is going to be dictated by fashion as much as function.
Have you thought to also check for maile in other locations (groin, back of knees, neck) that might give a clue?
Sorry I can't be more help.
Sean
- Cet
- Archive Member
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 1:01 am
- Location: jobstown, nj. usa
- Contact:
I suspect that the mail was double in some of these spots- i.e sewn to the garment as voiders inside the arm as well as being worn as sleeves overlapping the upper cannon.
In practice mail seems to flow over other mail pretty easily without snagging as long as it is well made so I don't envision that as a likely problem. I would envision voiders sewn to the arming doublets at the elbow and possibly along the upper arm with full separate sleeves being droned separately as well.
In practice mail seems to flow over other mail pretty easily without snagging as long as it is well made so I don't envision that as a likely problem. I would envision voiders sewn to the arming doublets at the elbow and possibly along the upper arm with full separate sleeves being droned separately as well.
Signo,
You have posed an interesting question, and one which I have been worried about for many years.
I think that the typical Italian mail arm defense is a loose fitting sleeve which falls over the plate armor of the upper arm and reaches to about the middle of the elbow. I do not recall ever having seen an example in art which unequivocally shows any mail worn in the bend of the elbow in addition to these sleeves.
It seems like they must have thought that the elbow length sleeve worn over the plate was sufficient protection.
Mac
You have posed an interesting question, and one which I have been worried about for many years.
I think that the typical Italian mail arm defense is a loose fitting sleeve which falls over the plate armor of the upper arm and reaches to about the middle of the elbow. I do not recall ever having seen an example in art which unequivocally shows any mail worn in the bend of the elbow in addition to these sleeves.
It seems like they must have thought that the elbow length sleeve worn over the plate was sufficient protection.
Mac
Robert MacPherson
The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.
http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.
http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
- Otto von Teich
- Archive Member
- Posts: 17440
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2000 2:01 am
- Location: The Great State of Texas.
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 28806
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Nashua, N.H. U.S.
- Contact:
Remember that Italian 15th century Image of the wounded knight with his cuirasse taken off, being removed from the saddle? Posted over on the Arms and Armour Forum? I would bet that solution - the two sleeves, joined in a sort of mini-halter-top, was pretty commonplace in Italy. It makes a heck of a lot of sense. No visible voider at the elbow.Mac wrote:Signo,
You have posed an interesting question, and one which I have been worried about for many years.
I think that the typical Italian mail arm defense is a loose fitting sleeve which falls over the plate armor of the upper arm and reaches to about the middle of the elbow. I do not recall ever having seen an example in art which unequivocally shows any mail worn in the bend of the elbow in addition to these sleeves.
It seems like they must have thought that the elbow length sleeve worn over the plate was sufficient protection.
Mac
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 26725
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 1:01 am
- Location: Port Hueneme CA USA
I read somewhere (can't recall atm) of a "bishop's mantle" (maille) that had extensions that wrapped around the upper arm. Is this related to what Chef describes?
As an aside, I'm interested in reading more about these bishop's mantles (especially working patterns as well regarded books on the subject) - can anyone point the way?
Thanks,
Avery
As an aside, I'm interested in reading more about these bishop's mantles (especially working patterns as well regarded books on the subject) - can anyone point the way?
Thanks,
Avery
It seems readily apparent that, while both of these men armed in mid-15th century Italian armour wear mail sleeves over their rerebraces, neither seems to be wearing mail voiders in the bend of the elbow.
"When a land rejects her legends, Sees but falsehoods in the past;
And its people view their Sires in the light of fools and liars,
'Tis a sign of its decline and its glories cannot last."
And its people view their Sires in the light of fools and liars,
'Tis a sign of its decline and its glories cannot last."
Thank you for you reply!
So, this kind of voiders
http://www.battlemerchant.com/popup_ima ... 81&imgID=0
should be employed with floating arm harness of the kind that was fashionable in germany, and not with milanese white harness (early XV°),
For which a large sleeve like Mac describe should suffice, like a common haubergeon while more and more uncommon should be ok for the beginning of XV° century.
So, this kind of voiders
http://www.battlemerchant.com/popup_ima ... 81&imgID=0
should be employed with floating arm harness of the kind that was fashionable in germany, and not with milanese white harness (early XV°),
For which a large sleeve like Mac describe should suffice, like a common haubergeon while more and more uncommon should be ok for the beginning of XV° century.
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 28806
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Nashua, N.H. U.S.
- Contact:
I would say yes.Signo wrote:Thank you for you reply!
So, this kind of voiders
http://www.battlemerchant.com/popup_ima ... 81&imgID=0
should be employed with floating arm harness of the kind that was fashionable in germany, and not with milanese white harness (early XV°),
For which a large sleeve like Mac describe should suffice, like a common haubergeon while more and more uncommon should be ok for the beginning of XV° century.
But not seperate individual sleeves, the best rig I saw was in that Italian image I described, which the fellow was wearing what would be similar to a haubergorn, if you trimmed off everything below the armpit. I;ve tried seperate mail sleeves with pauldrons, and I didn;t find them to work well, they wanted to droop.
Were I going for Italian style voiders, it would be the short sleeved halter-top for me. When I saw that image, it was as if it were a revalation from on High.
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 39578
- Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:00 pm
The St Louis Art Museum has a suit of Maximillian plate (c1510-1525)with mail wired(spiral wound through the holes) to the edges of the upper and lower arms. I'm not sure that is original, but the Italians certainly liked mail between the bottom of the greaves and the toecap on their shoes.
[img]http://stlouis.art.museum/emuseum/media ... 711926.jpg[/img]
They also have a nice mantle (1st half 16thC)
[img]http://stlouis.art.museum/emuseum/media ... _1_NEW.jpg[/img]
[img]http://stlouis.art.museum/emuseum/media ... 711926.jpg[/img]
They also have a nice mantle (1st half 16thC)
[img]http://stlouis.art.museum/emuseum/media ... _1_NEW.jpg[/img]
Vypadni z mého trávnÃk!
Does loyalty trump truth?
"If they hurt you, hurt them back. If they kill you, walk it off."- Captain America
Does loyalty trump truth?
"If they hurt you, hurt them back. If they kill you, walk it off."- Captain America
Here is the picture that Bob is talking about.
This guy is wearing sleeves and a skirt, but not an entire haubergeon. This reduces bulk, weight and redundancy.
Mac
This guy is wearing sleeves and a skirt, but not an entire haubergeon. This reduces bulk, weight and redundancy.
Mac
Robert MacPherson
The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.
http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.
http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 28806
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Nashua, N.H. U.S.
- Contact:
Joaquin wrote:It seems readily apparent that, while both of these men armed in mid-15th century Italian armour wear mail sleeves over their rerebraces, neither seems to be wearing mail voiders in the bend of the elbow.
I love this picture.. have since the first time I saw it.... I am so going to model my kit after it....I'm already 40% there..
Lord Alexander Clarke, Righteous Brother of the Priory of St. Colin the Dude, The Bear of Hadchester, Squire to Sir Cedric of Thanet
~Chivalry unpaired with Valor is a meal to starve a mans soul~
~Chivalry unpaired with Valor is a meal to starve a mans soul~
- Otto von Teich
- Archive Member
- Posts: 17440
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2000 2:01 am
- Location: The Great State of Texas.
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 28806
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Nashua, N.H. U.S.
- Contact:
In the uncropped original image, you can see his cuirasse (with faulds), and the armet he was wearing.
A 'fauld' of mail, worn underneath whatever armour overall, was 'de rigure' in the 15th century. They were worn under jacks, brigandines, and full suits of plate. The only other near-universal piece of mail, regardless of type of harness being worn, would be the standard of mail
A 'fauld' of mail, worn underneath whatever armour overall, was 'de rigure' in the 15th century. They were worn under jacks, brigandines, and full suits of plate. The only other near-universal piece of mail, regardless of type of harness being worn, would be the standard of mail
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:16 pm
- Location: Canberra, Australia
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:41 pm
- Location: England - East Yorkshire
Many Italian harnesses seem to have stop ribs and rolls incorporated into the vambrace. If we then take into account that Milanese armours generally favoured the mounted knight, would covering the back of the elbow be important?
With stopribs, rolls and detachable extra large couters to prevent lance penetration, and as swords are of little threat to the elbows of the mounted knight, (at least in my opinion) why would maille need to be there?
With stopribs, rolls and detachable extra large couters to prevent lance penetration, and as swords are of little threat to the elbows of the mounted knight, (at least in my opinion) why would maille need to be there?
Seconded. I'd love to see the uncropped version!Aussie Yeoman wrote:Chef de Chambre,
what is the name or this painting and the artist? Perhaps more importantly, where can one see the uncropped image?
Dave
We're just Harmless, Historical Nuts.
Who wear boiler plate on our butts.
Who dress up clothes from the 12th century.
And bash on each other with sticks and debris.
And make up the world's largest private army...
Harmless, Historical Nuts.
Who wear boiler plate on our butts.
Who dress up clothes from the 12th century.
And bash on each other with sticks and debris.
And make up the world's largest private army...
Harmless, Historical Nuts.
Qwertypolk,
Bolts and arrows. 1:100 chance of getting an arrow or bolt shot at an unarmoured spot is something worth carrying another ~10lbs of steel and spending a significant amount of cash on some extra protection. Also, such additional armour, increases the safety factor, which means alot in the event that primary armour does fail for whatever reason. Mind you, that stop ribs will not stop all glancing lance points, sword and dagger thrusts, arrows and bolts.With stopribs, rolls and detachable extra large couters to prevent lance penetration, and as swords are of little threat to the elbows of the mounted knight, (at least in my opinion) why would maille need to be there?
If you find anything wrong in your life, know that it is your own fault.
http://belgradearmourer.deviantart.com/
http://belgradearmourer.deviantart.com/