Youtube video on ancient Greek armor technology
Moderator: Glen K
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
Youtube video on ancient Greek armor technology
I stumbled on this video in Youtube. Check out the arrow tests against the linothorax and the Dendra Panoply, very cool.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Aznz9mj5grA
Wasn't there and ASCA that went along with the SCA?
Grace and Peace,
Jovian
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Aznz9mj5grA
Wasn't there and ASCA that went along with the SCA?
Grace and Peace,
Jovian
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Laurel, MD USA
- Contact:
Oh, yeah, I've seen that before. It has some VERY cool information, but also some not-so-good. The X-raying of the helmet at the beginning is fascinating. He says that the helmet is 2-1/2 pounds, about the average for that style as far as I've seen. But he also says it's generally 2mm thick, which can't be right--my repro is made from 1mm bronze, and weighs FIVE pounds. So something is wrong. I expect the weight given is right--much easier to toss something on a scale than to do accurate thickness measurements on something like that.
They also keep saying "Late Bronze Age", but that is an IRON Age helmet which happens to be made of bronze (as most were at that time). Also, those "spear holes" on the first breastplate are more likely nail holes, from when the piece was hung up as a trophy.
They keep saying that these weapons from c. 1500 BC are some of the oldest bronze weapons known, which is wrong by a thousand years! They're very right that the weapons are very strong and fully functional, and that the metalworkers were geniuses.
The first reenactor is gorgeous and knows his stuff, but it is NOT Trojan War era gear--it's Classical! Much later (even if the screwed-up chronology of the Bronze Age is fixed by chopping the usual dates by 300 years).
Nice-looking linothorax, but there is no evidence for a leather core, and no evidence that it was glued. The Mycenaean versions were clearly just quilted, as can be seen in frescoes.
Their figure-8 shield is awful, and predates the Trojan War by roughly 200 years. Really crappy "boar tusk" helmet--they didn't even use boar tusks! I did.
http://www.larp.com/hoplite/BThlm10.jpg
And they didn't overlap the pieces, gads. No wonder it didn't work... GOOD reproductions of the Dendra armor prove that it weighs no more than 30 pounds and is reasonably mobile. "Armor-piercing bodkin"...
Well, I shouldn't be nit-picking, sorry! It could have been a much better show. But if it has sparked your interest in that general era, COOL! I'll be happy to babble more, or you can come over to the Bronze Age Center and get a real eye-full:
http://s8.invisionfree.com/Bronze_Age_Center/index.php?
Khaire,
Matthew
They also keep saying "Late Bronze Age", but that is an IRON Age helmet which happens to be made of bronze (as most were at that time). Also, those "spear holes" on the first breastplate are more likely nail holes, from when the piece was hung up as a trophy.
They keep saying that these weapons from c. 1500 BC are some of the oldest bronze weapons known, which is wrong by a thousand years! They're very right that the weapons are very strong and fully functional, and that the metalworkers were geniuses.
The first reenactor is gorgeous and knows his stuff, but it is NOT Trojan War era gear--it's Classical! Much later (even if the screwed-up chronology of the Bronze Age is fixed by chopping the usual dates by 300 years).
Nice-looking linothorax, but there is no evidence for a leather core, and no evidence that it was glued. The Mycenaean versions were clearly just quilted, as can be seen in frescoes.
Their figure-8 shield is awful, and predates the Trojan War by roughly 200 years. Really crappy "boar tusk" helmet--they didn't even use boar tusks! I did.
http://www.larp.com/hoplite/BThlm10.jpg
And they didn't overlap the pieces, gads. No wonder it didn't work... GOOD reproductions of the Dendra armor prove that it weighs no more than 30 pounds and is reasonably mobile. "Armor-piercing bodkin"...
Well, I shouldn't be nit-picking, sorry! It could have been a much better show. But if it has sparked your interest in that general era, COOL! I'll be happy to babble more, or you can come over to the Bronze Age Center and get a real eye-full:
http://s8.invisionfree.com/Bronze_Age_Center/index.php?
Khaire,
Matthew
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
I'm still watching it, but I noticed some neat stuff. Many of the swords/spears they have shown so far have the tips broken off. That is probably from use, because they are still from a mostly thrusting era. The swords and spears with those large central ridges would have only limited effectiveness for cutting. Many of the swords that have been found broken off at the tang, and are attached to the hilts with 3-5 rivets were used for cutting, but it is hard on the metal, and the handles break off.
My 10yo daughter says I'm pretty!
Squire to Jarl Asgeirr Gunnarson, Barony of Vatavia, Calontir
Squire to Jarl Asgeirr Gunnarson, Barony of Vatavia, Calontir
He may have mixed up his pounds and kilograms since he used different measurements.Matthew Amt wrote:He says that the helmet is 2-1/2 pounds, about the average for that style as far as I've seen. But he also says it's generally 2mm thick, which can't be right--my repro is made from 1mm bronze, and weighs FIVE pounds.
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Laurel, MD USA
- Contact:
It's possible, but the math doesn't seem to work. Two and a half kilograms should be 5-1/2 pounds. But 2mm thick bronze should be closer to 10 pounds! And of the original helmets I've seen weights for, most were 2 to 3 pounds, maybe as much as 4. So I think they're mis-estimating the thickness somehow.Alcyoneus wrote:He may have mixed up his pounds and kilograms since he used different measurements.
Khaire,
Matthew
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:30 pm
- Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Many bronze helmets have some of the edges folded over creating a double thickness. Few people have deep-throated micrometers so the only thickness measurements they can do are around the edges. I agree with Matt's assessment of that video. The arrows tests are worthless since neither target is even close to the original items.
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:36 pm
- Location: Williamsburg, VA
- Contact:
What exactly is worng with the shield? Since I have no idea what constitutes a proper figure 8 shield construction.
The guy in the lino-kit, I don't think was being presented as Homeric. They were mentioning the Persian wars at that point.
The linothorax may be wrong in construction, but it does prove that they at least HAD the tech available to make extraordinary armour.
What were the years of use for the lino? And is the only evidence we have for the Mycenian one? What year?
What makes the Dendra tests worthless? It was plates of bronze. The overlap shouldn't matter just sitting still on a stand, should it?
The guy who rags about the heavy 35 pound armour should go into the desert with the 100 pounds our troops carry nowadays. I'm pretty sure they're mobile, and pretty sure 35 is lighter than 100.
Hell, he should just try 35# of anything on. it just aint that bad. I know, I'm carrying an extra fifty right now...lol
thanks,
Christopher
The guy in the lino-kit, I don't think was being presented as Homeric. They were mentioning the Persian wars at that point.
The linothorax may be wrong in construction, but it does prove that they at least HAD the tech available to make extraordinary armour.
What were the years of use for the lino? And is the only evidence we have for the Mycenian one? What year?
What makes the Dendra tests worthless? It was plates of bronze. The overlap shouldn't matter just sitting still on a stand, should it?
The guy who rags about the heavy 35 pound armour should go into the desert with the 100 pounds our troops carry nowadays. I'm pretty sure they're mobile, and pretty sure 35 is lighter than 100.
Hell, he should just try 35# of anything on. it just aint that bad. I know, I'm carrying an extra fifty right now...lol
thanks,
Christopher
War kittens?!!!
"Born to lose. Live to win."
Historical Interpreter- Jamestown Settlement Museum
Master's Candidate, East Carolina University
Graduate of The College of William & Mary in Virginia
"Born to lose. Live to win."
Historical Interpreter- Jamestown Settlement Museum
Master's Candidate, East Carolina University
Graduate of The College of William & Mary in Virginia
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Laurel, MD USA
- Contact:
Well, it had a nice wicker base, but even that is not firmly documented. And even if the real ones HAD a wicker base, it might have been done from strips of ash or something, rather than cane or reed or whatever. The covering looked like painted canvas, whereas the originals are often shown with a cowhide pattern. They may have had more than one layer, since that's what Homer describes for later shields (Trojan War era).RenJunkie wrote:What exactly is worng with the shield? Since I have no idea what constitutes a proper figure 8 shield construction.
Actually, I wasn't even going to mention the arrow tests, since even these somewhat questionable reconstructions stopped the arrows! My best guess is that the original armor and shields would have been much better.
Yes, but they were kind of vague sometimes when they were skipping back and forth. It would be very misleading or confusing to someone who didn't know better.The guy in the lino-kit, I don't think was being presented as Homeric. They were mentioning the Persian wars at that point.
Homer mentions the linothorax more than once, and there are clear depictions of quilted Mycenaean tunics. So you're talking at least 1000 BC.What were the years of use for the lino? And is the only evidence we have for the Mycenian one? What year?
As far as we can guess, what they used was the Indian-made Deepeeka version of the Dendra cuirass (or panoply, pronounced PAN-o-plee...). And Deepeeka doesn't use anything as hard as a historical bronze with 5 to 10 percent tin. So the original armor would have been noticeably stronger. But again, even the cheap repro stopped the arrow!What makes the Dendra tests worthless? It was plates of bronze. The overlap shouldn't matter just sitting still on a stand, should it?
Their "boar tusk" helmet, on the other hand, was personally insulting...
You got it! I think there was a mention that the Dendra armor was used by a charioteer, but they didn't have to moan for so long about how it would have been impossible to take the heat and weight. Heck, a balanced show might have had a modern veteran trying on the Dendra armor and expressing his surprise about how light and cool it was by comparison! No heavy boots or fatigues to trap the heat, good mobility of all the plates, etc. THAT would make a good show!The guy who rags about the heavy 35 pound armour should go into the desert with the 100 pounds our troops carry nowadays. I'm pretty sure they're mobile, and pretty sure 35 is lighter than 100.
Khairete,
Matthew
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
What poundage were Trojan/Classical Greek bows?
The archer in the video was using a 160# bow with steel bodkins. I would have liked to see them use bronze arrowheads and a more accurately powered bow.
Did anyone else see the rope around his waist while using the hide shield? No wonder it didn't flop around. Is there any evidence for using a rope or strap like that? I would think it would get in the way.
Grace and Peace,
Jovian
The archer in the video was using a 160# bow with steel bodkins. I would have liked to see them use bronze arrowheads and a more accurately powered bow.
Did anyone else see the rope around his waist while using the hide shield? No wonder it didn't flop around. Is there any evidence for using a rope or strap like that? I would think it would get in the way.
Grace and Peace,
Jovian
-
- Archive Member
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:30 pm
- Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia