Mine is on its way from the UK now.wcallen wrote:My wife says my copy is sitting at home.
It must be on a slow boat, estimated delivery is 4/16.
I am flying back to China that week for a 3 week business trip.
I better get it before I leave.
Tom
Mine is on its way from the UK now.wcallen wrote:My wife says my copy is sitting at home.
It is here!!Enrico di Venezia wrote:Mine is on its way from the UK now.![]()
It must be on a slow boat, estimated delivery is 4/16.![]()
I am flying back to China that week for a 3 week business trip.
I better get it before I leave.
Tom
I guess your right.wcallen wrote:I assume by "installing" you mean "running" - at least for Windows the readme tells you that the app will only run from the stick directly. I haven't tried to copy it, I am being a good boy and following the rules as stated.
Wade
These were great to see by themselves.wcallen wrote: We were talking about how the upper cannons of the arms on A-21 might actually work, whether they have been reworked, whether they are upside down, etc.
I was surprised to read in Mann's 1986 supplement that he though the sallet had at one point had the bevor attached.We played with other parts of A-21 - you can see all sorts of entertaining things on it like how the greaves and sollerets don't fit the way they would have originally. And how the breastplate is put together, and how the backplate would have moved, and how many changes have happened to the salade.
Be careful - read the descriptions. For example, the hooks to hold the pauldron straps? They are later additions. Not part of the actual pieces when they were used.Enrico di Venezia wrote:These were great to see by themselves.wcallen wrote: We were talking about how the upper cannons of the arms on A-21 might actually work, whether they have been reworked, whether they are upside down, etc.
The little hooks to catch the pauldron straps were interesting.I was surprised to read in Mann's 1986 supplement that he though the sallet had at one point had the bevor attached.We played with other parts of A-21 - you can see all sorts of entertaining things on it like how the greaves and sollerets don't fit the way they would have originally. And how the breastplate is put together, and how the backplate would have moved, and how many changes have happened to the salade.
I take this to me a configuration like the one at the MET as shown in this post by James Arlen Gillaspie.
It also is great to get the weights of each piece down to the 0.01 kg level.
Tom
Yeah, duly noted. I have just started looking through this today.wcallen wrote: Be careful - read the descriptions. For example, the hooks to hold the pauldron straps? They are later additions. Not part of the actual pieces when they were used.
Baron Alcyoneus wrote:I have a question about the armor on the cover (A30).
There are two rivets near the temple on the visor, are there two rivets on each side of the visor, or just the R side? What is their purpose?
KeggeR wrote:just wanted to ask a question since I have never seen any of these books close up. Its ultra high resolution pictures of historical artifacts? As for the actual break down or design of the armor, when people craft patterns based off of these types of books - are they crafted by imagination of how they believe best represents the pattern shown, or is there more detailed information on the actual construction of the peaces?
Thank you!
-PS sorry to ask such a dumb question, just wanted to know cause I might pickup a fewthnx
This memory stick contains high resolution (I wouldn't say ultra-high, I am greedy) pictures of all of the pieces of European armour and arms in the Wallace collection. They identify the date of manufacture. Most people would call all of them "historical artifacts", but there are pieces that were made in the 19th and 20th c. to complete older pieces.KeggeR wrote:just wanted to ask a question since I have never seen any of these books close up. Its ultra high resolution pictures of historical artifacts? As for the actual break down or design of the armor, when people craft patterns based off of these types of books - are they crafted by imagination of how they believe best represents the pattern shown, or is there more detailed information on the actual construction of the peaces?
Thank you!
-PS sorry to ask such a dumb question, just wanted to know cause I might pickup a fewthnx
That does appear to be the case.Baron Alcyoneus wrote:So the solitary rivet is a false/decorative rivet?
Sweet thanks for the link, kinda pricy for an impulse purchase so i'm going to have to wait a bit. But I put it on my wish list!!wcallen wrote:http://www.wallacecollection.org/shop/b ... -catalogue
I just ordered from the Wallace bookshop directly. A very nice man helped me get just what I wanted.
I did cheat and buy the "book only" one from Amazon. Yes, I have 2 copies of the book, but I can't swing a spare copy of the digital one.
Wade
I just saw them thanks! I noticed that they took pictures over every angle, it looks amazingwcallen wrote:Scroll up. I posted some earlier. From memory, only one was really zoomed all the way in.
The main thing you get isn't crazy resolution, it is actual images from multiple angles of all of the pieces. Something you will never get again, and never be able to do yourself.
Wade
Tom,Enrico di Venezia wrote:That does appear to be the case.Baron Alcyoneus wrote:So the solitary rivet is a false/decorative rivet?
Tom
Baron Alcyoneus wrote:My thought was that it was the intial pivot point for the visor, and after the hinge was put in, it was plugged.
I don't know what to make of that thing. I have worried about it, on and off, for about 25 years. As it stands, it does not seem very useful. Perhaps there is something missing from the mechanism, or perhaps it is a misguided replacement.Baron Alcyoneus wrote:The arm lower down, is that to hold the visor open to get a bit more air in?
This is where the thumb drive again proves useful.Mac wrote:I don't know what to make of that thing. I have worried about it, on and off, for about 25 years. As it stands, it does not seem very useful. Perhaps there is something missing from the mechanism, or perhaps it is a misguided replacement.Baron Alcyoneus wrote:The arm lower down, is that to hold the visor open to get a bit more air in?
Mac
Yes, that is the rivet we are talking about.Mac wrote:Tom,Enrico di Venezia wrote:That does appear to be the case.Baron Alcyoneus wrote:So the solitary rivet is a false/decorative rivet?
Tom
By the third rivet, do you mean the one directly over the pivot? While it is currently a decorative rivet, that hole probably onece held a pin to attach a reenforcing visor.
Mac
Coincidentally there is currently this thread over on the AAF with some pictures of the KD armour.Mac wrote:Baron Alcyoneus wrote:My thought was that it was the intial pivot point for the visor, and after the hinge was put in, it was plugged.
That's good thought, and it would work if you used that hole to allign the hole on the hinge which will become the concealed pivot. My conclusion is based on the KD armor, which is contemporary and also made by Koloman. It has pegs in those locations.
You don't even need the thumb drive to see this, take a look at this page at the Wallace Collection website.Enrico di Venezia wrote:This is where the thumb drive again proves useful.Mac wrote:I don't know what to make of that thing. I have worried about it, on and off, for about 25 years. As it stands, it does not seem very useful. Perhaps there is something missing from the mechanism, or perhaps it is a misguided replacement.Baron Alcyoneus wrote:The arm lower down, is that to hold the visor open to get a bit more air in?
Mac
It appears that the good Baron is correct.
When the visor is opened this piece swings into a rectangular opening at the top of the cheek plate, holding the visor up.
Tom
