Kilian_the_warlike wrote:Hey Ruel,
First I want to say that the rest of your kits are positively awesome. But we HAVE to talk about your jester. The nylon halloween costume HAS to go. Your other three kits are amazing, but it really sticks out. Its like a mcdonalds happy mean surrounded by three dishes of truffle fed veal.
I have tons of references and resources if you desire them.
http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h37 ... 3dydx8.jpg
Thanks Kilian for the comments and references -- your jester kit looks great! I'd definitely love to see your references; the only thing I've encountered so far is Lee 1995p140 (a non-academic source citied in the notes on my jester webpage linked above), and I'd like to bolster it with more scholarly material. It's good to know that others have already worked on this topic.
When I get around to making my jester more historical, I'll probably just start from scratch and build an entirely new costume. Since this one serves its purpose as my "evil jester" in its present form, I'll just leave it as it is and have a separate kit be my "historical jester." This one's already proven its worth terrorizing the local RenFaire last spring, and I'm reluctant to invest further in it -- adding more time, money, or effort won't likely make this jester any more effective at creating turmoil than he already is!

I have way too many kits in progress, and would like to finish some of those before revising the jester. But you'll be happy to know that I don't go around representing this one as being historically authentic; it "pays homage" rather than "reconstructs." Yet interestingly enough, the idea of the evil jester terrorizing women already appears in 16thc Germany, in Holbein's
Totentanz. Here's a scan from the Dover reprint, showing a skull-faced jester intimidating a group of court ladies:
http://www.forensicfashion.com/1538Germ ... eriod.html
Thanks again! I'll definitely be coming to you for guidance in making Jester #2. Do you have your research uploaded online somewhere?