Dirt mound for an archery target?

An area for discussing methods for achieving or approximating a more authentic re-creation, for armour, soft kit, equipment, ...

Moderator: Glen K

Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

Talked to a pal of mine who's much more into archery than I am, and mentioned that I want a period archery target to go with my exquisite Jaap Kopperdrayer longbow. Since I do early 14th century, he was quick to show me this image from the Luttrel Psalter (c. 1330). Is this a pile of dirt? That's what he thinks... Are there more images like this?

I found an article on Karen's site that refers to this scene as depicting a 'wreath shoot' and it mentions the use of poles to suspend the wreath, which is obviously not the case in this particular image. I actually quite like the mound of dirt idea, but a second or third source would make me feel better about digging a large hole on the property and manipulating the dirt like I'm Richard Dreyfuss...

-Gerhard

Image
MediumAevum
Archive Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:40 am

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by MediumAevum »

It is actually called a 'butt'. As to exact construction I've never seen a good description. Here is the entry from the MED
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/m/mec/med ... s=22520321
User avatar
Ranif
Archive Member
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 6:32 pm
Location: House Attica, Rowany, Lochac

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Ranif »

Gerhard
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCA-Archery
The "Files" section has a number of documents on period targets, etc.
If you can't get in because you're not a member, join.
Ranif
Nullus anxietas amicus
Carpe argillam

"Sorry, would you repeat that?
Couldn't understand you through the whining"
Gavin Kilkenny.
User avatar
Sean Powell
Archive Member
Posts: 9908
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Holden MA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Sean Powell »

A direct strike to packed earth could be rough on an arrow, or at least more rough then a mound of hay. Also if you hit a rock in the dirt it could completely trash the arrow. Dry sand might be better but it doesn't mound well. Not certain how important that was to our ancestors but it pisses me off to damage my target arrows. If I had to do that I'd sythe down some hay and mound-it. If I lost an arrow too deep then it would show up whenI was feeding the animals.

ZERO historical proof but I wouldn't recomend it for regular modern practice.
igelkott
Archive Member
Posts: 1600
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Kingston, NY

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by igelkott »

I had never imagined using dirt for butts but the MED quotes linked above indicate turf or clay, so I guess it's possible. Rocks can obviously be screened out of the dirt very easily. Dirt shouldn't be much worse than the hard foam I've seen used a few times, although you are right that if it's allowed to pack and dry out it would get very hard. A simple mound of hay would not be anywhere near packed enough to catch arrows.
User avatar
Cian of Storvik
Archive Member
Posts: 4234
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Storvik, Kingdom of Atlantia
Contact:

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Cian of Storvik »

My guess is that the Lutrell is showing packed earth butts (possibly clay). The holes are drawn as rondels, probably to illustrate penetrating holes. If it was turfed, I think they'd be green and the holes would be invisible through the grass. I've never had an arrow break that hit turfed ground.
More often, than not, I find that the "period solution" to stuff makes a lot more sense than our "modern improved" solutions.
Indian grass matts work well (still not a period solution), but they're also expensive ($130 last time I bought one) and yourself and a half dozen friends will shoot them to pieces in about 1 or 2 seasons.
-Cian
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. - Anonymous
When wrongs are pressed because it is believed they will be borne, resistance becomes morality. -Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
woodwose
Archive Member
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Lucerne-in-Maine, Barony of Endeweard
Contact:

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by woodwose »

Anyone try a mix of hay and (screened/sifted) dirt for something like this? I'm thinking that the dirt might not pack down as hard because of the hay, and because of the dirt in the mix arrows would not get as burried into to the hay.
Matthew E. Johnston
Matthäus Kettner, OL
Mac
Archive Member
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Jeffersonville, PA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Mac »

Back when I was shooting regularly at a commercial range, the butts were made of stacks of homosote. They were very harsh. The heat generated by the friction of the penetration frequently melted the point glue and spread it along the shaft, gluing the arrows or bolts into the butts. The guys with aluminum arrows never had any problems, but we "medievals" lost a lot of heads and broke all too many shafts.

All things considered, I would rather shoot into any pile of dirt than that.

Mac
Robert MacPherson

The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.

http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
User avatar
William of Otterton
Archive Member
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Peterborough, ON (Ealdormere)

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by William of Otterton »

I've been spending some time looking at various medieval archery target pages I can find. I found this description on http://www.longbow-archers.com/target.html
This is an age-old shooting tradition used to improve the aim of the longbow men over a variety of distances. The butt was originally a wooden cask, later a wedge-shaped mound of earth covered with grass. Height at the target front was some 7 feet (2.1m) high and 4 feet wide (1.2m) at the bottom and 1 foot 4” at the top (0.4m), with a length of 9 feet (2.7m) behind the front, tapering off into the ground. The target face used to be a small piece of cloth or a disk made out of pasteboard about 4 inches (10cm) in diameter.
I've also been looking for more "period" targets instead of the standard Olympic style White/Black/Blue/Red/Gold modern targets that everyone seems to use. In looking at the braided straw targets that very much have the look and feel of a medieval target such as these

Image

Does anyone know of ones that are available in Canada and/or the USA that would be similar? There's loads of them in the UK and France but I'm guessing shipping would be near impossible due to customs and/or the sheer cost of an oversized object.
User avatar
Hugh Prescott
Archive Member
Posts: 1388
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: Calontir

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Hugh Prescott »

Saunder's archery located in Nebraska has grass butts up to 48 inches.

http://www.sausa.com/

Lilies War used them for several years. They do need some upkeep as in soaked with salt water once a year and soak them about a week before use if they have been in dry storage for months.
losthelm
Archive Member
Posts: 12207
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 1:01 am
Location: albion NY half way between rochester/buffalo
Contact:

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by losthelm »

I wonder if weaving thatch, millet, or straw would be a durable option.
On the other hand soil is not that bad on arrows depending on how loose it is and the amount of organic matter in the mound.
Wilhelm Smydle in the SCA

My Ebay Listings
My ETSY
User avatar
William of Otterton
Archive Member
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Peterborough, ON (Ealdormere)

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by William of Otterton »

Thanks Hugh. That's pretty close to perfect.

That also lead me to the phrase "Indian Cord Archery Matt" which is apparently the magic code word in North America. Using that, I found several other suppliers of them in the US of A.

Further discussions on an Ealdormere Archery group on Facebook has lead to the potential option of one of our members having some acreage and tacitly agreeing that they'll let us try building an actual turf-covered earth mound archery butt next spring hopefully... :)

Details to follow if/when it happens.
Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

Thanks for the information, folks! I've decided that I'm going to build an English style butte, using a mound of earth some 4' tall and covered in grass (eventually) and having handmade grape vine wreaths for center targets. I can do all of this from my yard, as of this moment, so it should be a relatively quick and fulfilling project.

Although the woven targets Griffin suggested do sound wise, I'd really like to actually put a butte to the test, and see how it affects my arrows as well as my general target shooting habits. Should make for an interesting historical exercise.

Do keep the conversation going! Super cool stuff...

-Gerhard
MediumAevum
Archive Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:40 am

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by MediumAevum »

Gerhard, if your going to take that much time you should really do a lot more research then just whats been done here, cause otherwise you'll spend hours and hours building it and someone like me will take an hour or two and come up with a bunch of evidence that what you did doesn't fit the evidence.
Mac
Archive Member
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Jeffersonville, PA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Mac »

Gerhard von Liebau wrote:Thanks for the information, folks! I've decided that I'm going to build an English style butte, using a mound of earth some 4' tall and covered in grass (eventually) and having handmade grape vine wreaths for center targets. I can do all of this from my yard, as of this moment, so it should be a relatively quick and fulfilling project.


-Gerhard
Go for it, Gerhard. As long as you screen our the rocks, you can't go too wrong.

Mac
Robert MacPherson

The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.

http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
Mac
Archive Member
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Jeffersonville, PA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Mac »

MediumAevum wrote:Gerhard, if your going to take that much time you should really do a lot more research then just whats been done here, cause otherwise you'll spend hours and hours building it and someone like me will take an hour or two and come up with a bunch of evidence that what you did doesn't fit the evidence.
Medium,

Let's not discourage Gerhard. He is doing ground breaking stuff, which will set him far in advance of what most archers are doing. If you can find more evidence while Gerhard is finding his wheel barrow, perhaps he can produce a more authentic butt.....but any pile of earth will be better than a hay bale.

Mac
Robert MacPherson

The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.

http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
Tracy Justus
Archive Member
Posts: 478
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Burlington. NC

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Tracy Justus »

If you have the room built two, like the archers in your illumination. --T.
User avatar
William of Otterton
Archive Member
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Peterborough, ON (Ealdormere)

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by William of Otterton »

Gerhard von Liebau wrote:Thanks for the information, folks! I've decided that I'm going to build an English style butte, using a mound of earth some 4' tall and covered in grass (eventually) and having handmade grape vine wreaths for center targets. I can do all of this from my yard, as of this moment, so it should be a relatively quick and fulfilling projec

-Gerhard
We'll be building one too now. We have official permission from a member of our Canton to build it on her farm. We'll research ours over the winter and hopefully start building it in the spring. There's just not enough time to get going on it now with autumn settling in quickly here. However, with the field she's letting us use, we could eventually build probably five or six on both sides of the field and have shoots that go back and forth. I'd think it's a good 100 yards or so if I remember it right. So not the 220 yard Church Green but that's fine. Most of us can't shoot much over 100 yards with our bows anyways.

Grif
Mac
Archive Member
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Jeffersonville, PA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Mac »

Griffin de Stockport wrote:
We'll be building one too now. We have official permission from a member of our Canton to build it on her farm. We'll research ours over the winter and hopefully start building it in the spring. There's just not enough time to get going on it now with autumn settling in quickly here. However, with the field she's letting us use, we could eventually build probably five or six on both sides of the field and have shoots that go back and forth. I'd think it's a good 100 yards or so if I remember it right. So not the 220 yard Church Green but that's fine. Most of us can't shoot much over 100 yards with our bows anyways.

Grif
Griff,

Rather than having six butts on either side at 100yds, you might consider having some shorter distances as well. Considering that any arrow that misses the butt will be hard to find, it might be more gratifying to shoot at distances where the archers can be reasonable sure not to miss the butts entirely. Perhaps 25, 50, 75, and 100. If the intermediate butts were staggered a bit left and right, you could shoot at any of them. If they were symmetrical, you could shoot from either direction. This only works, of course, if the land owner is willing to have butts in the middle of her field as well as the edges.

Mac
Robert MacPherson

The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.

http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

Mac wrote:He is doing ground breaking stuff...
Sorry, that made me laugh... I suppose this is rather ground breaking.

I'm not discouraged by the idea that my mound might not be perfectly accurate - I doubt it's possible for us to be sure of any recreation of a butte with what information is available to us. I read an essay on targets and shooting competition styles over at the SCA Archery page, and it seems reasonable enough that a mound of soft earth with a wreath, painted white on its face, should be appropriate enough for my purposes.

I'm actually headed outside to build up the mound, now. In fact, I hope to do the whole damn thing today, including a wreath. I'll post pictures later.

-Gerhard
Mac
Archive Member
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Jeffersonville, PA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Mac »

Gerhard von Liebau wrote:
Mac wrote:He is doing ground breaking stuff...
Sorry, that made me laugh... I suppose this is rather ground breaking.

I'm not discouraged by the idea that my mound might not be perfectly accurate - I doubt it's possible for us to be sure of any recreation of a butte with what information is available to us. I read an essay on targets and shooting competition styles over at the SCA Archery page, and it seems reasonable enough that a mound of soft earth with a wreath, painted white on its face, should be appropriate enough for my purposes.

I'm actually headed outside to build up the mound, now. In fact, I hope to do the whole damn thing today, including a wreath. I'll post pictures later.

-Gerhard
I try to chose my words carefully, and sometimes it even works.

We all await your pics.

Mac
Robert MacPherson

The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.

http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
MediumAevum
Archive Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:40 am

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by MediumAevum »

Gerhard von Liebau wrote:
Mac wrote:He is doing ground breaking stuff...
I'm not discouraged by the idea that my mound might not be perfectly accurate - I doubt it's possible for us to be sure of any recreation of a butte with what information is available to us. I read an essay on targets and shooting competition styles over at the SCA Archery page, and it seems reasonable enough that a mound of soft earth with a wreath, painted white on its face, should be appropriate enough for my purposes.
You read a page on targets on the SCA archery page and you feel you can make any sort of comment on the information available to us?
If you want to shoot at a dirt pile find a pile of clean dirt and shoot at it. Its much less work with the same result.
Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

MediumAevum wrote:You read a page on targets on the SCA archery page and you feel you can make any sort of comment on the information available to us?
If you want to shoot at a dirt pile find a pile of clean dirt and shoot at it. Its much less work with the same result.
Actually, I read an article discussing various original sources pertaining to historical tournaments and the targets that were used. I'm not at liberty to share the document directly here because it is not mine to share, but you're welcome to join free and instantly at the "SCA Archery" Yahoo! Group posted above by Ranif. If you go to the 'files' section and then to 'period targets & competitions" you'll be in the right place. A variety of contemporary documents were researched to put the article together, and I think it was an interesting read.

Having an educational background in Medieval History, I realize that a few vague sources are not enough to support any theories I can make regarding the proper construction of a butte. I have yet to see an apt description. Only a couple of images and references to their use in some of the cited sources from that article. But, unlike you, I don't have a stick up my ass, so I'm willing to try to construct a butte based on my own extensive knowledge of piles of dirt... And I suspect I'll have some fun doing it. In fact, I am. Here's some progress.

I had to clear the ground area where I'll be constructing the butte, which took a bit of time because it was chock full of Bermuda Grass and other unpleasant things. We have a rather extensive pile of grass clippings from the yard lawns, so I decided that I'd utilize some of it to support the structure of the butte, much like adobe is. Because I'm mixing the clippings into soft dirt it shouldn't harden up enough to be a trouble for arrow penetration, but will keep its form well.

Moving several cubic yards of dirt is a bit of a chore in 100 degree weather, so I'm going to go back out near evening to move as much more as I can, but I suspect the process will last quite a bit into the morning. I'll be mixing the dirt and grass while wet in buckets and packing it into shape as I go along. Hopefully I can get on that tomorrow.

Off to work on the wreath...

Piles of joy:
http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-s ... 1356_n.jpg

A view down the way. I have about 30 yards to fire, currently, and can pull a few more out if I clear some of the equipment we have piled due South of the target. Wind shouldn't be an issue while firing in this direction because a very large tree poses as a buffer from Easterly winds, which are common here.
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-a ... 5931_n.jpg

-Gerhard
MediumAevum
Archive Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:40 am

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by MediumAevum »

Actually I'm aware of the target article and I was impressed when I read it especially the parts on Italy, but it spends very little time on Buttes.

That yahoo group is actually a helpful and you really should read it more. So lets go with the traditional approach to making them.
Butts are composed of turfs of earth, and are in form nearly square, though somewhat resembling a wedge. Those turfs which are dug from a common, where the grass is short, with roots of heath-plants matted in it, are preferred to all others. These are laid upon each other, and pressed tightly together. The length of each butt in front is generally somewhat more than nine feet, the height seven feet, four feet deep at the base, and one foot four inches broad at the top.

These are placed at various distances, generally in sets, and so disposed that they do not stand in the way of the archer when shooting at any of the lengths. Upon them is placed the mark, (about breast-high,) which is a circular piece of thin white pasteboard, of about four inches in diameter.

Other butts, which are now more approved of, are made of straw, laid first in trusses, and then pressed down as tightly as possible, the ends being afterwards cut smooth. Butts of this description, being kept under cover, are very durable, and, from their never injuring the arrow, must be pronounced preferable to those made of earth.

The great advantage of butts is, that they save the trouble of carrying targets and their stands to the ground; nothing more being necessary in butt-shooting than the small pasteboard target, of which we have before spoken, which may be conveyed without any inconvenience to the place of exercise, and easily fixed on the butt. Earthen butts, or mounds, for archers to practise at, were formerly erected by statute in every parish in England. 33 Henry VIII. cap. 9.
While following 'traditional' methods doesn't make them right there is enough similarities to atleast start with them in this case. But I will also say there is enough time and difference to certainly look into sources for evidence as to how it was done in the Middle Ages.
Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

That description is pretty much ideal, if it were earlier, as you say. I plan on layering it along the entire circumference as I press it together, so in that sense it should follow this 'traditional' method. The use of plant matting for added rigidity was expected. Roots are obviously out of the question, though - I'm not going to bother finding a large pile of heath-plant roots for this project! Ha.

Sorry if I came off huffy towards you in the last post. I take much more kindly to criticism if it's mixed with contribution.

-Gerhard
Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

And here's a wreath. I had no idea what I was doing, but it worked. I'm going to let it dry for a couple of days then splash it with white paint. I assume I'll be making a lot of these...

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-s ... 3282_n.jpg

-Gerhard
MediumAevum
Archive Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:40 am

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by MediumAevum »

Gerhard von Liebau wrote: Sorry if I came off huffy towards you in the last post. I take much more kindly to criticism if it's mixed with contribution.
I was talking to another Archive member a few months ago about people who have or are good with information contributing here as they indicated it was not done as often and was once done, and here is the thing. You have to show that you have done enough looking and seeking to learn about it to make it worth me spending my time to contribute. You didn't do that, in fact you should have been the one who posted that description that I found on a simple search of the list you posted. The only reason I did that was because this was a topic I was looking into earlier this summer and I was wondering if there was anything in there I hadn't seen and if the article you were referring to was the same one I had already read.

You are interested in playing in the dirt, why would I spend my time contributing to that.
Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

Ah, horses get so high these days. Please. I spend most of my day researching Medieval German social history for my Master's. I can't crawl through every nook and cranny to dig up information on topics that other people may be much more well-informed on. That's why the Archive is here, to ask for help and share experiences and knowledge.

If you're not enjoying the Q&A here, or the progress, why don't you stop looking at the thread. Other, much more professional and polite individuals have taken the time to chime in with their assertions without whining about the effort I'm putting in. Which happens to include reading the material presented and attempting to build a butte in reality. You're just sitting behind your screen acting awesome. Think about it.

-Gerhard
MediumAevum
Archive Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:40 am

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by MediumAevum »

We aren't talking about nooks and crannies we are talking a simple search on something YOU posted.
Which means you didn't even read the materials that you said you've gone through. All people have said in this thread is experiences and ideas about shooting arrows into thing such as dirt. That is little to nothing about building an actual butte.
Griffin de Stockport is far more likely to create an actual butte as he understands it takes research to do so. Which means looking for actual information from the time period related to the building of buttes and not guessing and going out into the yard and playing in dirt.
Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

I'm not interested in creating an extremely accurate butte, Medium. I never said I was. I want to make a mound that has a realistic ratio of dirt to matting (since that's apparently what was used in their construction), is of an appropriate size and has the effect of being a reasonable visual recreation of what the sources show. I want to shoot arrows into it. I also never claimed to have read through any sources that I did not read. I said I read an article on Karen Larsdatter's website, and the article that I found on targets & competitions from the SCA Archery page. I also read through the MED link you posted. That's all I needed to read before being satisfied, for my own purposes.

I initially asked this question:

"..this image from the Luttrel Psalter (c. 1330). Is this a pile of dirt? That's what he thinks... Are there more images like this?"

And made this comment:

"but a second or third source would make me feel better."

Does it look like I want to build a perfect recreation of a butte? Have I ever said I want to? I asked for a couple of more sources and confirmation that the illustrated target I was mulling over was in fact primarily composed of dirt. End of story.

I applaud Griffin for his future efforts in most accurately reproducing a target of this sort. I hope that the information that's presented itself in this thread has been useful to him as I know it has for me. Your righteous tone and total misunderstanding in what I'm trying to accomplish boggle me. I want something that looks pretty accurate, can be made at home and that I can shoot arrows at. Not a museum display.

Also, this is all playing. I don't care if its in dirt, or leather, or steel, or if you're shooting a bow. The process of historical recreation, unless if it is specifically being utilized to further an academic study or to make a profit, is a hobby. I happen to farm; I move dirt to make money, to grow plants and to feed people. Of course this is "playing with dirt." What's your point?

-Gerhard
Russ Mitchell
Archive Member
Posts: 11800
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 1:01 am
Location: HQ, Garden Gnome Liberation Front
Contact:

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Russ Mitchell »

Medium,

Psst: you're holding the ball.

On a side note, unless you lived in pretty damned humid terrain (like, say, England), doing this true-to-cite is pretty much a non-starter anyway. That's a LOT of sod to cut and pile -- doing it "right" is either a quick way to inexcusably trash your land (as a farmer like Gerhard knows damn well), or else, start pricing sod at post-drought prices, and then start converting square yards to cubic...
No one cares how much you know, until they know how much you care.
MediumAevum
Archive Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:40 am

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by MediumAevum »

Gerhard von Liebau wrote: I want to make a mound that has a realistic ratio of dirt to matting.
If that is your criteria you are still no where near it, even assuming the approach would work. Thus far the descriptions seem to indicate sod, now assuming the structural elements of sod aren't important then your ratio probably isn't right as what you will basically be doing is making something similar to daub. And that even assumes that your soil can create a decent bond as it looks pretty sandy cause we are talking about something made in NW Europe and not California.
Gerhard von Liebau
Archive Member
Posts: 4942
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Dinuba, CA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Gerhard von Liebau »

By realistic I mean enough to hold it together, not the historical amount. I plan on using whatever amount of matting is necessary to hold the shape of my mound, which will actually be built out of fine, rich soil, not sand. It hardens up very well even without matting, although I doubt such a large pile would survive through much of our light rainy season without it.

My main concern is that it will actually harden up more than I would like it to, thus being harsh on my arrows. So yes, rather like daub, I suppose, but it certainly won't get that tough.

Perhaps I can eventually grow grass on it if it turns out to be too tough. I would consider a key element in keeping the top soil moist in this dry climate.

-Gerhard
User avatar
Roland Ansbacher
Archive Member
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Coeur d'Alene
Contact:

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Roland Ansbacher »

Russ, I'll take that ball now please.

Medium, I had to jump in here. While I appreciate the sentiment about doing research before you go and make a mountain out of a molehill, you did have a comment that pushed my buttons.

"You have to show that you have done enough looking and seeking to learn about it to make it worth me spending my time to contribute. "

This sentence is pretty much the elitist, snobbiest and dumbest thing I have heard in some time. I want to think that somehow I'm misunderstanding it, but it sounds to me like if he hadn't done "enough" research, you would not have offered any help. That is utter crap. It's this kind of elitist snobbery that chases people away, and prevents any meaningful discussion. I mean, if I know something that might contribute to the conversation, I don't think that sitting back and waiting until other contributors have "proven" themselves worthy of my time and effort.

On thing to keep in mind about the Archive. It is exactly that, an archive. This thread doesn't just go away when people lose interest in it. It gets stored, and people actually do search the Archive (sometimes) to help them do research. If they can find this thread, and it leads them to do more research, and actually learn something... that's just awesome! The other cool thing is that this thread isn't just about Gerhard piling up some dirt in the backyard, it's about people like me who have only a passing interest in archery but are curious to know what a "butte" may actually be. I just assumed they were haystacks, but hey, turns out there is a little more to it.

One of the amazing things about this board is here we have a conversation about a pile of dirt. We've got some rather knowledgeable people like Russ and Mac throwing in, and I've learned more then I ever needed to know about methods of Elizabethan projectile absorption! And I didn't have to jump through a magic hoop!

What I guess I'm trying to say is, you sound like you know what you're talking about. Contribute. Please. Give freely, and you would be amazed what comes back. Encourage people to pile dirt. Suggest better was to do it, but don't tell someone that if they can't do it perfectly not to even bother. Tell them how, tell them why, show us that listening to you is worthwhile. That your posts are worth our time to read. As it is, I've seen what Gerhard has done, and what he tries to do, and it's pretty cool. What can you bring to the table.

Who get's the ball next?

Sir Roland Ansbacher, OL
Mac
Archive Member
Posts: 9670
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Jeffersonville, PA

Re: Dirt mound for an archery target?

Post by Mac »

Butts are composed of turfs of earth, and are in form nearly square, though somewhat resembling a wedge. Those turfs which are dug from a common, where the grass is short, with roots of heath-plants matted in it, are preferred to all others. These are laid upon each other, and pressed tightly together. The length of each butt in front is generally somewhat more than nine feet, the height seven feet, four feet deep at the base, and one foot four inches broad at the top.

These are placed at various distances, generally in sets, and so disposed that they do not stand in the way of the archer when shooting at any of the lengths. Upon them is placed the mark, (about breast-high,) which is a circular piece of thin white pasteboard, of about four inches in diameter.

Other butts, which are now more approved of, are made of straw, laid first in trusses, and then pressed down as tightly as possible, the ends being afterwards cut smooth. Butts of this description, being kept under cover, are very durable, and, from their never injuring the arrow, must be pronounced preferable to those made of earth.

The great advantage of butts is, that they save the trouble of carrying targets and their stands to the ground; nothing more being necessary in butt-shooting than the small pasteboard target, of which we have before spoken, which may be conveyed without any inconvenience to the place of exercise, and easily fixed on the butt. Earthen butts, or mounds, for archers to practise at, were formerly erected by statute in every parish in England. 33 Henry VIII. cap. 9.


Being heretofore unfamiliar with the description that MediumA provided, I have searched it out on the web, and find that it is from "The Archer's Guide" of 1883 by the anonymous "Old Toxophilite. It can be found here in full http://www.archerylibrary.com/books/gui ... pter6.html

Stripping back the address brings us to this excellent collection of online archery texts http://www.archerylibrary.com/books/ I am probably not the only person who was unaware of this useful site, so I post it here, for the greater good.

Mac
Robert MacPherson

The craftsmen of old had their secrets, and those secrets died with them. We are not the better for that, and neither are they.

http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://www.billyandcharlie.com
https://www.facebook.com/BillyAndCharlie
Post Reply