I am documenting the build here:
http://www.forth-armoury.com/photo_gall ... pair_2.htm
This was build #1:
http://www.forth-armoury.com/photo_gall ... ntlets.htm
Steve

Yes, I could see how it would provide even better movement with smaller rivet heads. However, I must say I find the gauntlets as they are to be the most comfortable of any kind I have ever tried. They fit like, heh, a glove.The first is to use rivets with slightly smaller heads for the metacarpal lames. I think you will get better movement that way.
I'm really afraid of that stitch. This leather is so thin, 4-5 oz, that I 'm afraid it would tear through. And as these pieces have a ton of labor at them when it comes to the stitching point, I'd hate to ruin them at stitching time. I've got a special hooked leather punch for making these kinds of holes, and used them on some shoes that I never got around to assembling, but even on the shoe leather I had to be careful not to tear out the hole.The second is to make the seam at the wrist be an edge-to-edge butt seam, like medieval shoemakers used for their uppers. This type of seam will look nicer, and be more comfortable to wear. (we are, of course, looking at the "inside" of the seam here)
On pair #3, I will try using little rivets on the hands and big rivets on the cuffs.I think that the rivets you used on the cuffs would be good on the metacarpals. If you wanted to use the bigger rivets just for the splash of silver color I would recommend using those on the cuffs.
I think it might be tricky to sew the seam first. The first plate riveted in is the metacarpal, and then the horizontal lames follow in layers from there, with the wrist-most plate being laid down last. So you would need to be pretty certain where that seam was going to be before you started riveting in plates. I find it easy to start with an over-sized piece of leather, rivet in the plates, and then trim the leather to match the profile of the now-riveted plates. I got the idea for this by watching Brian Brown's reproduction process.I'm afraid of that seam too. I have used it for shoes, but I always need a drink afterwards. If I were making these gauntlets I would sew the seam first. That way it is not only easier to get in there with an awl, but if I screwed it all up, there is not so much invested. This is an extension of the general rule that states "do the diciest operation first".
Interesting idea, I will have to try that. The nice thing about this current method of stitching is that you can lay the cuff piece good-side to the hand piece's good size and run a row of stitches very close to the ends of the hand plates and the cuff plates, such that there is virtually no cap in coverage, and what gap there is is filled with 2 layers of leather. You would think that this ring of leather seam would be uncomfortable on the wrist but the leather is so flexible it tends to lay down pretty well and it is also under a layer of padding that I put between the shell and the glove. I do not notice the seam at all when wearing. But I like the lap seam idea.If you can not see your way clear to making a butt seam, you might consider a lap seam instead. They are strong and flat, and if the stitching is nice and even they look OK. If I were going to do it that way, I might even use my old Singer, and lay in two rows of stitching, far enough apart to allow for a row of rivets in between. Those rivets would secure another row of internal plates to armor the wrist gap. I realize that the gauntlets you are copying don't have plates there, but it's an obvious idea, and the Wisby material is a small sample size. It seems like a safe extrapolation.
Possibly. Or just plain old leather. Or maybe no cuff at all. With my harness, the cuff overlaps my vambrace and is largely redundant.Looking at the art, and knowing the lack of cuffs on Wisby #3, I've wondered if the cuffs shouldn't be a gamboissed construction instead of splints.
Thanks!Those look nice Steve, and it's a good walk through you've put together to follow your build.
I think that's about right.Out of curiosity, about how wide are the strips you used for the back of the hand and the finger scales? It's hard to say without something for scale, but I'm guessing about 3/4"?
Mac wrote:Steve,
I would like to recommend a couple of things, if I may.
The first is to use rivets with slightly smaller heads for the metacarpal lames. I think you will get better movement that way.
The second is to make the seam at the wrist be an edge-to-edge butt seam, like medieval shoemakers used for their uppers. This type of seam will look nicer, and be more comfortable to wear. (we are, of course, looking at the "inside" of the seam here)
Mac