an inverted demicrescent in chief!?! or: heraldry problems!

To discuss research into and about the middle ages.

Moderator: Glen K

Post Reply
Destichado
Archive Member
Posts: 5623
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2000 1:01 am

an inverted demicrescent in chief!?! or: heraldry problems!

Post by Destichado »

Now that I've got your attention...! :P

I have a number of "problems" with placing multiple symbols on a single coat of arms that I don't know quite how to deal with, so I'm throwing up examples, and I'd be obiged if anyone could help me describe them in proper heraldic language.


Here's a pair of simple ones that I was able to hack together in Paint. Forgive the crude design, I'll paint prettier pictures when I get back to my home computer.
Example 1
Example 2

More will follow!
Last edited by Destichado on Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Karen Larsdatter
Archive Member
Posts: 3104
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Ashburn, VA
Contact:

Re: an inverted demicrescent in chief!?! or: heraldry probl

Post by Karen Larsdatter »

Not-really-a-heraldry-herald, but I think I know the answer! Yay. :lol:

On both of these images: "passant" is the closest position to what the boar is doing, AFAIK, though he really ought to have one of his front feet raised, with the other front foot on the ground. (If it was running, it'd be "courant"; if the body was up at more of an angle and both of the back feet were on the ground, it'd be "salient.")

(Here's a link for a good little passant boar: http://www.rarebooks.nd.edu/digital/heraldry/graphics/charges/beasts/boar.gif)


Argent, a boar passant and in chief a key fesswise gules.


Argent, a boar passant and in chief two crescents gules.
Destichado
Archive Member
Posts: 5623
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2000 1:01 am

Post by Destichado »

so "in chief" is anything above the main charge? Interesting.



I know a charge is "proper" when it's in it's natural ordinary position -in the case of a spearhead (pheon), that's up and down. But how about a diagonal one like this? Example 3

And you can say there's two phaeons in chief and they'll be assumed to be side by side, but what about if there's two of them and they're the main charge? Example 4 I was thinking you'd say "a pair", but how would you distinguish that from if they were stacked one above the other?

Okay, now what if there's two diagonal ones, facing opposite directions? Example 5

And here's on that has me stumped. Would this be "arrayed"??? Example 6
User avatar
iaenmor
Archive Member
Posts: 1781
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Magnolia Texas US

Post by iaenmor »

http://sca.org/heraldry/primer/
The boar is in the position statant. Just a plain standing position. Passant is walking.
John Moore
User avatar
Karen Larsdatter
Archive Member
Posts: 3104
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Ashburn, VA
Contact:

Post by Karen Larsdatter »

Destichado wrote:so "in chief" is anything above the main charge? Interesting.

"In chief" describes my best guess at what you were trying to do, in the absence of an actual escutcheon-shape around the heraldry. I assumed that the main charge was at the center of the heraldry, and the smaller charges were stuck way up in the chief.

Destichado wrote:I know a charge is "proper" when it's in it's natural ordinary position -in the case of a spearhead (pheon), that's up and down.

"Proper" would be the color. The pheon's default position has it pointing downward (I think that's what you mean).

Destichado wrote:But how about a diagonal one like this? Example 3

"Pheon bendwise."

Destichado wrote:And you can say there's two phaeons in chief and they'll be assumed to be side by side, but what about if there's two of them and they're the main charge? Example 4 I was thinking you'd say "a pair", but how would you distinguish that from if they were stacked one above the other?

For Example 4, you're looking at "in fess two pheons." If they were stacked on top of each other -- that is, arrayed vertically -- it'd be "two pheons in pale."

Destichado wrote:Okay, now what if there's two diagonal ones, facing opposite directions? Example 5

In that particular example, I'd call it "in fess a pheon bendwise and a pheon bendwise reversed."

Destichado wrote:And here's on that has me stumped. Would this be "arrayed"??? Example 6

No, kinda more "confused." :twisted: If the ones at the sides were truly at right angles, rather than not-quite-at-right-angles, I guess I'd call it "in fess a pheon fesswise, a pheon, and a pheon fesswise reversed, " (though I may have the order of those three positions backwards).
User avatar
Rei Shounagon
Archive Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:59 am
Location: Finland (Drachenwald)

Post by Rei Shounagon »

Karen Larsdatter wrote:
Destichado wrote:so "in chief" is anything above the main charge? Interesting.

"In chief" describes my best guess at what you were trying to do, in the absence of an actual escutcheon-shape around the heraldry. I assumed that the main charge was at the center of the heraldry, and the smaller charges were stuck way up in the chief.

What she said. You have the boar drawn so much bigger than the key or the crescents that it appears to be the main charge, so the other charges are blazoned in relation to the boar.
Karen Larsdatter wrote:
Destichado wrote:Okay, now what if there's two diagonal ones, facing opposite directions? Example 5

In that particular example, I'd call it "in fess a pheon bendwise and a pheon bendwise reversed."

My version would be "in fess a pheon bendwise and a pheon bendwise sinister". The second pheon is oriented along an imaginary bend sinister.
Karen Larsdatter wrote:
Destichado wrote:And here's on that has me stumped. Would this be "arrayed"??? Example 6

No, kinda more "confused." :twisted: If the ones at the sides were truly at right angles, rather than not-quite-at-right-angles, I guess I'd call it "in fess a pheon fesswise, a pheon, and a pheon fesswise reversed, " (though I may have the order of those three positions backwards).

They are slightly more "one and two" than "in fess" to me. For my next trick, I will try to show what I mean by using only the keyboard:

In fess a pheon bendwise, a pheon, and a pheon bendwise sinister:
\| \|/ |/
A pheon bendwise, a pheon, and a pheon bendwise sinister, one and two:
. \|/
\|
. |/

In heraldry, it's usually not recommended to do something that is not quite one thing nor quite another. But of course, if you don't ask, you don't know what the parameters are.
The blossoming cherry, the morning dew, a good hair day. These things are fleeting: enjoy them while you may. - The diary of Saionji no Hanae
User avatar
Karen Larsdatter
Archive Member
Posts: 3104
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Ashburn, VA
Contact:

Post by Karen Larsdatter »

Rei Shounagon wrote:For my next trick, I will try to show what I mean by using only the keyboard:

:shock: PH34R J00R M4D L33T 4SC11 P0\/\/3RZ! :twisted:
User avatar
Kevin
Archive Member
Posts: 420
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Herndon, VA, USA

Post by Kevin »

Karen Larsdatter wrote:
Rei Shounagon wrote:For my next trick, I will try to show what I mean by using only the keyboard:

:shock: PH34R J00R M4D L33T 4SC11 P0\/\/3RZ! :twisted:


God didn't make you right, Karen.
User avatar
Karen Larsdatter
Archive Member
Posts: 3104
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Ashburn, VA
Contact:

Post by Karen Larsdatter »

Kevin wrote:God didn't make you right, Karen.

He didn't? :shock:

Then ... who did?
User avatar
Effingham
Archive Member
Posts: 15102
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Franklin, IN USA
Contact:

Post by Effingham »

PH34R J00R M4D L33T 4SC11 P0\/\/3RZ!


Just FYI:

Diet Coke passing through one's sinuses is no less painful than regular Coke.

Just thought I'd let ya know. :)


Effingham
Webpage: http://www.sengokudaimyo.com
Custom avatars: http://sengokudaimyo.com/avatarbiz.html
SENGOKU DAIMYO ONLINE SHOP: http://www.cafepress.com/sengokudaimyo
Grand Cross of the Order of the Laurel: http://www.cafepress.com/laurelorder
User avatar
Rei Shounagon
Archive Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 3:59 am
Location: Finland (Drachenwald)

Post by Rei Shounagon »

Karen Larsdatter wrote::shock: PH34R J00R M4D L33T 4SC11 P0\/\/3RZ! :twisted:

"I'm very sorry, I don't know what I should do or feel at a time like this." :)
The blossoming cherry, the morning dew, a good hair day. These things are fleeting: enjoy them while you may. - The diary of Saionji no Hanae
Konstantin the Red
Archive Member
Posts: 26713
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Port Hueneme CA USA

Post by Konstantin the Red »

This former toiler in the nooks of the College of Heralds really really likes the boar passant Gules of the first two examples. Two or three pheons placed in the region of that honorable Ordinary known as the chief ["in chief"] might also be considered, in place of the crescents.

Most Ordinaries have a division of the field named after them, with the exception of the Chief, and the Canton, if the canton's an ordinary. I'll lump the Quarter under the Canton, as they differ only in size.

This won't be heraldically significant in the SCA ordinary and armorial, but jazzing up the boar by giving him different-colored tusks and eyes and tongue might be very attractive. Red critters often get this done in blue.
"The Minstrel Boy to the war is gone..."
Post Reply