12th Century Surcoats and painted helms

An area for discussing methods for achieving or approximating a more authentic re-creation, for armour, soft kit, equipment, ...

Moderator: Glen K

Post Reply
User avatar
Talan Gwyllt
Archive Member
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 2:01 am
Location: PA
Contact:

12th Century Surcoats and painted helms

Post by Talan Gwyllt »

12th century marked the beginning of heraldry. Templars and other orders made use of it. This is nothing new. I would assume kingdoms and individual knights would use similar styles as well. Does this mean that those with a coat of arms would have a unique surcoat like we would see in later periods?

Often one of the neat things is about pennsic is walking around noticing the heraldry on shields and surcoats. Does this mean I could do it in a 12th century fasion?

What about construction? Linen surcoat in layers or a linen surcoat with a cotten backing for durability?

What kind of durability have people had with painted helms? How did you paint your helm?

Thoughts?

(I have an idea of a kit but need some advice to see if it's viable) :)
That green and white guy. What's his name?
Saint-Sever
Archive Member
Posts: 1590
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 1:01 am
Location: N. VA, among the noble Atlantians

Post by Saint-Sever »

My understanding is that for the 12th century, only great lords and royalty displayed their heraldry.

We ordinary knights contented ourselves with displays of color and patterns taken from our devices, but not the actual devices themselves.

M.
audax
Dark Overlord Chick of the Universe
Posts: 8416
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:44 am

Post by audax »

Saint-Sever wrote:My understanding is that for the 12th century, only great lords and royalty displayed their heraldry.

We ordinary knights contented ourselves with displays of color and patterns taken from our devices, but not the actual devices themselves.

M.


Pretty much what Michael said. Surcote might not even be in the wearers heraldic colors and the heraldry might be displyed only as a device or an escutcheon on the surcote.

Of course this is the SCA so you can wear whatever pleases you.
Martel le Hardi
black for the darkness of the path
red for a fiery passion
white for the blinding illumination
--------------------------------------
Ursus, verily thou rocketh.
User avatar
Corby de la Flamme
Archive Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Charlottesville, VA USA/Atlantia
Contact:

1215 at the earliest

Post by Corby de la Flamme »

I've been looking for documentation of a true "coat of arms" prior to 1215 for...well as long as I've known it was important, so 17 years or so.

Earliest documented actual heraldry goes to Geoffry Plantagenet's brass, circa 1143. It's on his shield only, nowhere else.

In the chronicles of the First Crusade no one's heraldry is mentioned.
In the chronicles of the Second Crusade the arms of great lords is mentioned.
In the chronicles of the third Crusade every noble's heraldry is mentioned.

That's why my arms are on my shield but my surcoats only have visual references to my arms, not the full "coat of arms."
For example.
Anyone with earlier documentation, please please correct me.
Baron Corby de la Flamme, Knight of Atlantia
House de la Flamme
"A true gentleman is one who is never unintentionally rude." -- Oscar Wilde
User avatar
ThorvaldR Skegglauss
Archive Member
Posts: 2015
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:33 am
Location: Drachenwald (Germany)

Post by ThorvaldR Skegglauss »

Sir Corby,

I don't know that I can remember ever seeing your shield, just about every pic I have seen of you is with a polearm in your hand or you on the sidelines watching. I would be interested in seeing your shield. I am considering moving my personna up to the Second Crusade and would like to see your interpretation.

Thorald
Hertogi ThorvaldR Skegglauss, Drachenwald KSCA

Just have fun and do right by yourself and others.
User avatar
Robert of Canterbury
Archive Member
Posts: 2169
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Salisbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Robert of Canterbury »

Post Reply