codpiece protection

To discuss research into and about the middle ages.

Moderator: Glen K

Post Reply
Dan Howard
Archive Member
Posts: 1757
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia

codpiece protection

Post by Dan Howard »

Did the codpiece offer any real protection (compared to an unmodified fauld) or was it simply a fashion accessory?
Maeryk
Archive Member
Posts: 71527
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 2:01 am

Re: codpiece protection

Post by Maeryk »

Dan Howard wrote:Did the codpiece offer any real proterction (compared to an unmodified fauld) or was it simply a fashion accessory.


Umm.. I'm thinking it might have been padding _for_ the fauld.

That said, I fought for YEARS with just a fauld. No cup. Never had a problem. Only time I ever got cupped was when I was wearing a cup and a spearman bounced one off the ground, and up into my cup. That sucked.
Dan Howard
Archive Member
Posts: 1757
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia

Post by Dan Howard »

I'm not talking about the hidden cup worn by SCA fighters. I'm talking about the visible steel codpiece that was introduced to some plate harnesses. Does it provide more protection than an umodified fauld? Does it enable more flexibliity in the legs compared to an unmodified fauld? Does it have any practical benefit or was it simply an emulation of civilian fashion?
Last edited by Dan Howard on Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Maeryk
Archive Member
Posts: 71527
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 2:01 am

Post by Maeryk »

Dan Howard wrote:I'm not talking about the hidden cup worn by SCA fighters. I'm talking about the visible steel codpiece that was introduced to some plate harnesses. Does it provide more protection than an umodified fauld? Does it enable more flexibliity in the legs compared to an unmodified fauld?


Right.. Okay. I thought you meant the typical fabric codpiece.

I think it was just more ostentatious.. a visual representation of "Mine's Bigger". :)
User avatar
InsaneIrish
SQUEEE!
Posts: 18252
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Jefferson City Mo. USA

Post by InsaneIrish »

Maeryk wrote:
Dan Howard wrote:I'm not talking about the hidden cup worn by SCA fighters. I'm talking about the visible steel codpiece that was introduced to some plate harnesses. Does it provide more protection than an umodified fauld? Does it enable more flexibliity in the legs compared to an unmodified fauld?


Right.. Okay. I thought you meant the typical fabric codpiece.

I think it was just more ostentatious.. a visual representation of "Mine's Bigger". :)


Yep, a visual representation of how "manly" you are.

Although have heard that the metal codpiece was removable thus making it easier to ride in full harness. A full fauld there would bounce on the Bow of the saddle. But I can't substantiate that.
Insane Irish

Quote: "Nissan Maxima"
(on Pennsic) I know that movie. It is the 13th warrior. A bunch of guys in armour that doesn't match itself or anybody elses, go on a trip and argue and get drunk and get laid and then fight Tuchux.
Post Reply