Corey D. Sullivan wrote:Is it still copywrite infringement if the object in question is a historical piece?
By that I mean a copy of a historical original. Theoretically, we could go out and make a resin cast of the original skull, if we could get our hands on it, so it's not like it's the artists property. Right?
Or I'm completely off base...
There can be a ton of issues with this... Museums often claim ownership of their pieces, even though they were made centuries ago.
Also, this probably was not a casting, but a recreation, which does make it his work. Now... if he's willing to do a run, depending on cost, I'd be glad to toss my name in the ring. Looks like 4 or 5 of us may be interested...
My original thought was
not for someone to make a casting of Jones's work, but that someone may recreate another version of the same or similar historical artifact.