Maile - round vs flat

This forum is designed to help us spread the knowledge of armouring.
Post Reply
User avatar
Charles Alexander
Archive Member
Posts: 2005
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: River/Mountains - PA

Maile - round vs flat

Post by Charles Alexander »

I was curious of the differences between a round ring hauberk, (either welded or riveted) vs a flat ring hauberk.

I gather the flat ring is more historic, but would it protect better? Differences in weight would be dependant on the gauge of the round ring(and of course the metal used). I would also think the round ring would also be more flexible.

Flat ring may have a smaller diameter, leaving the maille less likely to be pierced by a sword point or arrow head.

Any thoughts? Keeping historical accuracy secondary for the moment, is there much difference between the two? Is either method superior?
My battlecry is "Spoon!"

"There are no happy endings, because nothing ends."
- Peter S. Beagle
Signo
Archive Member
Posts: 4963
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by Signo »

I think that with the same cross section, flat rings are less prone to be opened like this O ---> C so I would dare to say that they perform a little better against piercing.
Wire material
wire diameter
ring diameter
heat treatment
I think those are much more important in determining the performance of a maille.
Russ Mitchell
Archive Member
Posts: 11800
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 1:01 am
Location: HQ, Garden Gnome Liberation Front
Contact:

Post by Russ Mitchell »

My ballistic tests showed no appreciable performance difference between the two against incoming arrows.
User avatar
James B.
Archive Member
Posts: 31596
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Ashburn VA
Contact:

Re: Maile - round vs flat

Post by James B. »

Charles Alexander wrote:I gather the flat ring is more historic


Round rings are used from the Roman era until the end of the use of maille. Flat rings come about in the 13th century.

Each modern reproduction shirt has it plus and minuses. I have a shirt of each; one for Roman reenacting (works for Viking too) and one I use for 14th and 15th century stuff. One is 8mm and the other is 6mm; the biggest thing for me is the ring size when I look at buying maille.
James B.
In the SCA: Master James de Biblesworth
Archer in La Belle Compagnie
Historic Life
User avatar
Charles Alexander
Archive Member
Posts: 2005
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: River/Mountains - PA

Post by Charles Alexander »

Thank you. This is helpful...
My battlecry is "Spoon!"

"There are no happy endings, because nothing ends."
- Peter S. Beagle
User avatar
Andrew Young
Archive Member
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 9:08 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Post by Andrew Young »

Charles

This may have been before the unnamed...I, I mean the crash..."SHHH" dont repeat that aloud...

but I posted a similar thread about the frequency of round vs flat and in what context....aventail/camail.....bishops mantel....hauberk....regional and century.

As I recall, there were a lot more round rings than we realize. I suspect the sexy trend has been to go with flat rings as a refreshing change (vs round which was the "standard" for butted all these many years) but riveted round was indeed quite common and remains so in the extant context.

I suggest the Armoury of Churburg Castle

You can get a copy at your library...
http://www.amazon.com/armoury-castle-Ch ... B00088DHDQ
Fine Armour and Reproductions
Living History & Accurately Formed 'SCA' Grade
-----online catalog coming this spring----

http://www.partsandtechnical.com
.
Post Reply