Not sure what the movement issue is. Most faulds hang on leather straps in the front and slotted rivets on the side. If they are all straps then they tend to gap as well as rotate when you turn. The BOTTOM of the fauld is riveted to the leather but not the top and the leather bunches up on the inside while the plate rides up on the outside. If you see rivet heads at the top of the fauld that arn't sliders they were probably temporary construction rivets that held the fauld together during shaping and heat-treating, removed and then the outside hole was filled with a decoritive dummy rivet while the inside hole was used to attach the leather.
Can you post pictures to show us the problem you are having? Mac had a comment around here someplace about Toby Capwell's suit and a high saddle. The high saddle made it possible to wear a period fauld without it bunching up. It may not be 100% possible in a modern western saddle. I don't know as I don't ride.
You had better make sure you can mount a horse properly wearing your fauld. If not, you will have to forget the sliding rivets and leather the side that's hanging you up.
James Arlen Gillaspie wrote:You had better make sure you can mount a horse properly wearing your fauld. If not, you will have to forget the sliding rivets and leather the side that's hanging you up.
VERY good point. That would probably mean sliders on the left and leathers on the right. I seem to recall a suit set up that way (I may have to do that on my own suit as well)
Hmmm. Given that the left side is the one struck by lances in a tourney and that slotted rivets would generally prevent gapping better then leathers, do you think there is any connection between that and always mounting the horse from it's left side... or do you think direction of mounting became customary much much earlier and the sliding/leather combination was lucky happenstance?
Sean
(asking because what I know about horses and riding wouldn't fill a single page in double-spaced 18point text.)
mounting horses from the left comes from the position of the scabbard on the left leg, and so would have come long before plate armour had reached the stage of sliding rivets.
You really need a picture with your arms hanging straight down rather then tucked up like a T-rex. Something looks a little 'off' in the proportions but there is nothing to compare it to. A full body shot including straight arms and head would be clearer.
Sean Powell wrote:You really need a picture with your arms hanging straight down rather then tucked up like a T-rex. Something looks a little 'off' in the proportions but there is nothing to compare it to. A full body shot including straight arms and head would be clearer.
Sean
I agree. Its either sitting too low or its too long (I fear saying).
I took the liberty of adjusting the height and cut....it looks like the plackart is a good 3-4 inches too long....at least for the look your going for. You could add one more fauld lame perhaps, but cut of the breastplate itself should terminate around your navel, top of the hips. Bear in mind this image isnt perfect....but should give you a better idea of the sit and cut and length of the cuirass.
Fine Armour and Reproductions
Living History & Accurately Formed 'SCA' Grade
-----online catalog coming this spring----