Registering Heraldry

An area for discussing methods for achieving or approximating a more authentic re-creation, for armour, soft kit, equipment, ...

Moderator: Glen K

Post Reply
User avatar
William of Otterton
Archive Member
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Peterborough, ON (Ealdormere)

Registering Heraldry

Post by William of Otterton »

Taken from another thread in order to help not derail it...

MilleniumLancelot wrote:Not to Hijack but....

It seems to me that there is probably only a limited number of Devices that can be accepted following the rules of the Heralds.


Well, yes... there would be a mathematical number somewhere I'm sure. However, that number would be huge given the number of variances that are allowed along with permission to conflict letters.

And I bet that while the number might be pretty high, its probably rapidly approaching the limit.


Actually, we run over a 90% acceptance rate on all our Ealdormere submissions for devices. Reason being, we have a very active commentary group amongst our Heralds and we meet as often as possible when there's sufficient submissions that need to be sent up to Laurel. A lot of time, devices bounce from insufficient conflict checking on the Canton and/or Kingdom level and not from some draconian set of Obscure Rules that those evil Society level Heralds pull out of their magical hats.

ON another note... a general question.
How many registered dievices are out there?

As far as I know, there's about 75,000'ish registered names and/or devices with the last official .db file being uploaded last September (I think). I know there is work being done on the next update but I have no idea when it's supposed to be posted.

I tried to open the entire O&A database on my poor over-worked computer and it couldn't get more than 65,500 opened, and that was in the mid "S" range. Keep in mind that includes both names AND devices so there's some overlap - a registered name WITH a registered device would really only count as one entry I believe.

And how many of you all use a device on your shield/tabbard/whatever that isnt registered?


My name and device were some of the first things I made official about myself when I first joined the SCA many years ago. However I know a good many people do use a device that isn't registered. This can pose a problem in a few ways.

If you DO decide to register and you find out that Duke Sir Fancypants of An Tir has had it registered since 1983 and it's well known throughout half the Known World... well, too bad - sorta. The easiest way to deal with this is that you can always ask permission to conflict with that person. Maybe they'll say yes, maybe not. From what little discussions I've had with other Heralds about this... generally the permission is granted depending on the location of the two individuals.

If you dig through historic rolls of Arms, you'll find many many instances of the same device belonging to different individuals. There's one fighter in Ealdormere right now I'm working on trying to get his arms passed with the problem being that there's TWO very similar devices already registered but sufficiently different from each other. I think I'll have to write up 2 letters and humbly beg permission to conflict because they're both VERY far away from here and the chance of any of these people being at the same event at the same time is remote at best.

I'd hate to see someone have a wonderful tabard made, along with a matching shield painted beautifully along with dyed silk banners outside your tent and then show up and Pennsic and find that King Soggybritches has had the EXACT same device registered to him for 10 years and have him request you take yours down for the duration of War. Talk about being slightly red in the face (not to mention I'm sure some harsh words and whatnot flying around from over-stretched emotions)...

One other idea that's been floating around the Kingdom here lately is the fact that there's really a lot of really GREAT simple and field only armoury that's still not claimed. I did some digging last month and I was *shocked* at the number of simple (think colour & metal only with no charges) quarterly and per pale and per bend devices that are not spoken for. If anyone wants a device, go simple instead of complex. In an overly complex device is where, I find, you run into too many conflicts. If you come up with a wonderful design you love, and it conflicts, see about taking something OFF instead of adding more junk. You may be surprised what will pass.

Humbly,
Griffin de Stockport
Herald of Petrea Thule
MJBlazek
Archive Member
Posts: 8179
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Union Maine
Contact:

Post by MJBlazek »

Griffen,

Sir your words are highly valuable to mine ears!

Thankyou.

Also did you see the pic i posted in the other thread?


I will post it here and you can tell me what you think.



Matt
Attachments
S1226a.JPG
S1226a.JPG (27.66 KiB) Viewed 192 times
Lord Alexander Clarke, Righteous Brother of the Priory of St. Colin the Dude, The Bear of Hadchester, Squire to Sir Cedric of Thanet

~Chivalry unpaired with Valor is a meal to starve a mans soul~
User avatar
D. Sebastian
Archive Member
Posts: 11463
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 1:01 am
Location: East - Haus VDK
Contact:

Post by D. Sebastian »

You have Gules (red), an boar statant (standing) sinister (facing left) argent (white)

in both pictures.



For SCA purposes, dark red and medium red are the same (is that brown? The SCA doesn't use brown).


Either way, I think you're looking at a definate conflict.


(ps - doubble check with a real herald for propper blazoning)
SCA Demo .com
Like it? Link it!

Mattyds .com
(my site)
User avatar
D. Sebastian
Archive Member
Posts: 11463
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 1:01 am
Location: East - Haus VDK
Contact:

Post by D. Sebastian »

SCA Demo .com
Like it? Link it!

Mattyds .com
(my site)
MJBlazek
Archive Member
Posts: 8179
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Union Maine
Contact:

Post by MJBlazek »

:sad: Its supposed to be marroon


but heres a change!!
Attachments
untitled2.JPG
untitled2.JPG (13.48 KiB) Viewed 179 times
Lord Alexander Clarke, Righteous Brother of the Priory of St. Colin the Dude, The Bear of Hadchester, Squire to Sir Cedric of Thanet

~Chivalry unpaired with Valor is a meal to starve a mans soul~
Glen K
Archive Member
Posts: 14413
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Post by Glen K »

Moved from the HR forum, because SCA heraldry really isn't "historical research". :)
MJBlazek
Archive Member
Posts: 8179
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Union Maine
Contact:

Post by MJBlazek »

Now your just being snarky cause its me...but your right its not!
Lord Alexander Clarke, Righteous Brother of the Priory of St. Colin the Dude, The Bear of Hadchester, Squire to Sir Cedric of Thanet

~Chivalry unpaired with Valor is a meal to starve a mans soul~
User avatar
Robert of Canterbury
Archive Member
Posts: 2169
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Salisbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Robert of Canterbury »

MJ, (If that's what we ought to call you now..:) )

might I suggest you check Gules a chevron between three boars Argent.

Its a more typical arrangement of the charges.

Regards

Robert of Canterbury
Gules three Fleeces Argent.
User avatar
Oswyn_de_Wulferton
Archive Member
Posts: 2861
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:15 pm
Contact:

Post by Oswyn_de_Wulferton »

I can let you know right now it doesnt have enough differences to pass because of a local guy. He has the same arrangement but with a spade instead of a boar. Same colors too. Pretty sure it is already registered.
Westerners, we have forgotten our origins. We speak all the diverse languages of the country in turn. Indeed the man who was poor at home attains opulence here; he who had no more than a few deiners, finds himself master of a fourtune.
User avatar
InsaneIrish
SQUEEE!
Posts: 18252
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Jefferson City Mo. USA

Post by InsaneIrish »

try these. From a heraldic standpoint whether you make the boar in a conventional style or "Celtic" style makes no difference.

Also, the color silver and the color white are heraldically the same color when blazoned.

FYI, probably 90% of the "celtic" animals people use today are modern drawings and modern peoples interpretation of Celtic animorphs.
Attachments
boar-shev.jpg
boar-shev.jpg (24.41 KiB) Viewed 127 times
boar-shev-head.jpg
boar-shev-head.jpg (28.69 KiB) Viewed 127 times
Insane Irish

Quote: "Nissan Maxima"
(on Pennsic) I know that movie. It is the 13th warrior. A bunch of guys in armour that doesn't match itself or anybody elses, go on a trip and argue and get drunk and get laid and then fight Tuchux.
MJBlazek
Archive Member
Posts: 8179
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Union Maine
Contact:

Post by MJBlazek »

I have no real attachment to the celtic styling. I just did a quick google for "silver boar" to pu tthe pic up.

Thanks both for your input.
Lord Alexander Clarke, Righteous Brother of the Priory of St. Colin the Dude, The Bear of Hadchester, Squire to Sir Cedric of Thanet

~Chivalry unpaired with Valor is a meal to starve a mans soul~
User avatar
Oswyn_de_Wulferton
Archive Member
Posts: 2861
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:15 pm
Contact:

Post by Oswyn_de_Wulferton »

Oh, MJB I saw my friends device this weekend and got it confused. The spade is on the bottom and the chevron on top. Just an FYI.
Westerners, we have forgotten our origins. We speak all the diverse languages of the country in turn. Indeed the man who was poor at home attains opulence here; he who had no more than a few deiners, finds himself master of a fourtune.
User avatar
Rev. George
Archive Member
Posts: 8917
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 1:01 am
Location: athens. ga usa
Contact:

Post by Rev. George »

that might clear... i dunno though.

As for the burgundy: The SCA doesnt accept murrey (the heraldic term for that colour) as a tincure. Further, if you submit something, blazon it as Gules, but colour in the picture burgundy, they will return it and say "advise the client to make the red more red"

For some reason we default to the emblazon, not the blazon, like every other heraldic authority out there.

-+G
The path to knighthood is paved with strength and nobility, not LSD and sideburns.

Rev's Rainments
Quality Medieval Clothing at a Fair Price.
Site coming soon~
User avatar
William of Otterton
Archive Member
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Peterborough, ON (Ealdormere)

Post by William of Otterton »

Rev,

That's part of the beauty of the SCA heraldry. Draw it and blazon it for submitting so it's all OFFICIAL but then make the final touches when you really do it how you like. If someone really wants burgundy, I'll suggest they submit red in the artwork, red in the blazon but then just paint their shield and sew their tabard however they want colourwise.

Even the blazoning for my own device isn't *quite* right, but it's passed in such a close way that I can nudge it to how I want it and it's still perfectly protected.

GdS
User avatar
Rev. George
Archive Member
Posts: 8917
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 1:01 am
Location: athens. ga usa
Contact:

Post by Rev. George »

Oh, I'm the biggest proponent of post registration "artistic liscence". That estoile will quickly become a snowflake, ETC

-+G
The path to knighthood is paved with strength and nobility, not LSD and sideburns.

Rev's Rainments
Quality Medieval Clothing at a Fair Price.
Site coming soon~
Post Reply