Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:19 am
by Jehan de Pelham
That is a handsome set. Are these yours? If so, how did you acquire them?

John
Jehan de Pelham, esquire and servant of Sir Vitus
www.mron.org

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:51 pm
by Jon Barber
Jehan de Pelham wrote:That is a handsome set. Are these yours? If so, how did you acquire them?


John, you'll find those and a nice selection of other goodies here.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 3:54 pm
by Jehan de Pelham
Ah, yes. Arma Bohemia... Thanks for the link.

Too bad most of their stuff is 15th century...but they have some good earlier stuff too!

John

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:43 am
by Charlotte J
The Boke of Keruynge

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/187096 ... oding=UTF8

I wish I would have found this discussion earlier. I just did a table display entry, and included some of this info in the docs. The reading I did was very helpful when it came time to explain to the judges what was going on at MTA. That's why I was in the pictures, as a sort of guide. I wouldn't have been serving.

Here's a reader's digest version of things, if it helps.

http://www.mathildegirlgenius.com/Docum ... tation.pdf

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:45 am
by Baron Alejandro
Char rocks like socks in a box. 8)

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:10 am
by Jehan de Pelham
Every day I take great pleasure in learning. Thank you very kindly, Charlotte!

John
Jehan de Pelham, esquire and servant of Sir Vitus
www.mron.org

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 12:08 pm
by pfeiffer-perkuhn
Hi Ben,

do you have eny Evidence for a Pricker used für eating? I read this sometimes but i have never seen a Pricker on a Table or used this Way on a picture. I am in doubt if they where used for this.

Best regards

Andrej

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:37 pm
by Marshal
apolloniavoss wrote:Would I use the spoon to hold it down or would I just stick the entire piece on my knife and eat it or would I pick it up with my fingers?


Two knives. Think of it as eating Florentine. ;)

Re: finger Bowls and Bread Trenchers

Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:53 pm
by Charlotte J
James B. wrote:Image



Aiii! Hooray for necro-thread with baby! That baby is now almost 6...

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 1:50 pm
by Gaston de Clermont
Yeah, for a second I thought this brought Michael St. Sever back. I miss that guy.

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:54 am
by Milan H
Edit: I didn't realize this was an ancient thread... saw april in the dates and assumed it was recent. Disregard unless someone is interested in talking about this!

Sorry I haven't got time to get caught up on this post so this may have been said, but eating without a fork is quite easy. A modern example are Persians who still eat without forks at the table. Most food is prepped small enough to just eat, but if its not you hold it down with your spoon, and cut it. Then slide the food onto the spoon with the knife. If you look at the way most Europeans eat, it is exactly the same way but using a fork. They don't impale all their food with the tines, but most frequently slide it onto the fork then eat it. I am convinced this is a cultural remnant from pre-fork days.

Cheers!

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:30 am
by James B.
Gaston de Clermont wrote:Yeah, for a second I thought this brought Michael St. Sever back. I miss that guy.


Sigh.... I have not removed his number from my phone yet.

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:32 am
by Ceadda

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 12:53 pm
by uwhguy
My "Lotto daydream" has been to hire about 400 day-laborers, kit them out with minimum SCA armor, give them spears, short swords and bucklers, and drill the living daylights out of them for about 6 months under SCA "officers" until they could move, fight and communicate like a machine.

Then I'd load 'em onto buses and go to Pennsic, GW, GWW and Estrella over the next 6 months or so, and see what happened.

Win or lose, it would make for great stories for years to come.

Michael]


Thats awesome!

Re: Meat Portion Sizes at Feast

Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:00 am
by DavidEvans
Karen Larsdatter wrote:
(We are all expected to be noblemen -- and yet we eat at feasts where we are not only expected to be our own carvers & pantlers, but we are our own servers and butlers too. We're even required to bring our own dishes when dining, not only in the banquets of our own lords and barons, but when we travel abroad as well!) :lol:



Welll....It appears that it was fairly common for people to carry their own bowls, plates, cups, glasses, knifes, spoons etc with them as they travelled.

Very high ranking people may even bring their whole household with them...:-)

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:07 am
by Jeff J
Oooo - necro-thread!

I'd forgotten that I had to wear leg armor serving at that MTA event. We were really rushed to get the presentation together. :)

NO FORKS!

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:19 am
by Baron Alcyoneus
I thought they were trenchers. ;)

Re: Eating without a fork

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:22 pm
by Munz
pfeiffer-perkuhn wrote:Hi Ben,

do you have eny Evidence for a Pricker used für eating? I read this sometimes but i have never seen a Pricker on a Table or used this Way on a picture. I am in doubt if they where used for this.

Best regards

Andrej


According to "Cutlery for the Table: A History of British Table and Pocket Cutlery" what we call pickers were not used for eating. From what I remember reading in the chapter on the 14th century, they were a steel for sharpening your cutlery and not used to pick up food. The book did discuss small forks that were used for eating sweet, sticky items like pears in syrup. There was also a reference to multiple people using the same knife for a meal. Up to six was considered OK. It was not uncommon for people to stay and eat even though they didn't have utensils or trenchers.