SCA legality question on some besegews.

For those of us who wish to talk about the many styles and facets of recreating Medieval armed combat.
Post Reply
JvR
Archive Member
Posts: 2265
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:42 pm
Location: South Florida

SCA legality question on some besegews.

Post by JvR »

I dont know much about SCA armour requirements but will one day play in the SCA. I have a set of besegews for my black and white harness like in the picture. (yeah I know, I have a harness but don't play)

Since the SCA does not allow grappling, I wonder if these would be ok? They have a little point in the middle and wondered if it was a no go as I know the SCA is pretty strict.

Could someone also point out the ruling that would disallow or allow them?

I will ask my local marshal as well if I ever make it to a practice or an event. I just wanted to get a broad opinion on this for now.

pics
Image
Baron Alcyoneus
Archive Member
Posts: 39578
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:00 pm

Post by Baron Alcyoneus »

The most important rule would be this:

Will it fit into a legal (1" wide) eyeslot more than 1/2"?
User avatar
Leo Medii
Archive Member
Posts: 8246
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Coeur de Lion Farms - Team Lion heart Jousting
Contact:

Post by Leo Medii »

A lot of the guys in my unit wear them. Never had a problem.

Then again, you never know. Something that no one had ever said anything about in 10 years of fighting might one day be totally illegal to someone. Seen it happen.
Lion of Irnham - Martial undertaking should never be a lowest common denominator endeavor.
User avatar
Vladimir
Archive Member
Posts: 5524
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Northern VA USA

Post by Vladimir »

Personally I have no problem with them. Heck, most elbow cops can slide right into a bargrill with no problem.
Per pale sable and gules, two eagles rising respectant Or and in base an open
book argent.
zippy
Archive Member
Posts: 870
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Boston, MA

Post by zippy »

its up to your marshals in your area
we can talk about it all day
but really that is the only way you will know
User avatar
Thorstenn
Archive Member
Posts: 2131
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Barony of Oldenfeld, Trimaris.

Post by Thorstenn »

I am the Trimarian Earl Marshal. I would have no problem with them at all as long as they don't stick out 3 inches and don't come to a sharp point. If the tip is rounded just a bit it might be better for inter Kingdom events. As I cannot guarantee other Kingdoms approval, I would go to bat for these to be legal.
If a local Marshall gives you grief, send it up to me :wink:

Thor.
Duke Thorstenn the WrongHand
Trimaris.

"A fully equipped duke costs as much to keep up as two Dreadnoughts, and dukes are just as great a terror -- and they last longer."
David Lloyd George

"Amat victoria curam."
User avatar
dukelogan
Archive Member
Posts: 5581
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 1:01 am
Location: leading the downward spiral
Contact:

Post by dukelogan »

doesnt apply since thats not the business end of a weapon (thin shafted combat arrows exempt of couse). armour doesnt have such a requirement. that is if we are talking about the round thingys near the armpit.

regards
logan

Baron Alcyoneus wrote:The most important rule would be this:

Will it fit into a legal (1" wide) eyeslot more than 1/2"?
Ebonwoulfe Armory is fully stocked with spears again! For now the only way to order them is to send an email to ebonwoulfearmory@gmail.com with the quantity and your shipping address. We will send a PayPal invoice in response including your shipping cost.
User avatar
Vladimir
Archive Member
Posts: 5524
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Northern VA USA

Post by Vladimir »

Yes, the round things.

He's right. I don't think armour has that requirement.

If it did we would have to roll the edges on all pieces of...OMG!!!! :twisted:
Last edited by Vladimir on Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Per pale sable and gules, two eagles rising respectant Or and in base an open
book argent.
User avatar
Keegan Ingrassia
Archive Member
Posts: 6332
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 4:07 pm
Location: College Station, Texas (Shadowlands)

Post by Keegan Ingrassia »

Vladimir wrote:Yes, the round things.

He's right. I don't think armour has that requirement.

If it did we would have to roll the edges on all pieces of...OMG!!!! >:)


:lol: Roll -and- pad! Could you imagine how it'd look, if every exposed edge was made so that it couldn't fit in a 1" gap?
"There is a tremendous amount of information in a picture, but getting at it is not a purely passive process. You have to work at it, but the more you work at it the easier it becomes." - Mac
User avatar
Vladimir
Archive Member
Posts: 5524
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Northern VA USA

Post by Vladimir »

I don't have to imagine.

I'm an evil denizen. :twisted:
Per pale sable and gules, two eagles rising respectant Or and in base an open
book argent.
User avatar
Keegan Ingrassia
Archive Member
Posts: 6332
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 4:07 pm
Location: College Station, Texas (Shadowlands)

Post by Keegan Ingrassia »

What's your number? :P
"There is a tremendous amount of information in a picture, but getting at it is not a purely passive process. You have to work at it, but the more you work at it the easier it becomes." - Mac
igelkott
Archive Member
Posts: 1600
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Kingston, NY

Post by igelkott »

The 1/2" rule into an eyeslot doesn't apply to armor. My rule of thumb on stuff like this is I would ask you the following......

If I was to wear your armor, and you wore minimums, would it be ok for me to trip and fall onto you? Oh, and by the way, have another person then fall on top of me on top of you? Because this will happen in a press in bridge battles, etc.

It's a little hard to tell from your photo, but they do look a little pointy. Although if you wanted to wear them in a tourney only, especially one with more period emphasis, then it would probably be OK.

Chris
Baron Alcyoneus
Archive Member
Posts: 39578
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:00 pm

Post by Baron Alcyoneus »

Aren't tree limbs and twigs padded at Pennsic? ;)
Vypadni z mého trávník!

Does loyalty trump truth?

"If they hurt you, hurt them back. If they kill you, walk it off."- Captain America
User avatar
dukelogan
Archive Member
Posts: 5581
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 1:01 am
Location: leading the downward spiral
Contact:

Post by dukelogan »

and this is the main problem with the marshallate. too much of this "what if" and "well i think that". the rules are simple, our sport is very safe, and marshals need to learn to follow the letter and not engage in "could might possibly maybe" stuff coupled with the misconception that the human machine is fragile. i mean i still see folks on the field in spurs (with heads all over the ground), hay bales, and dark victory junk.

regards
logan

igelkott wrote:The 1/2" rule into an eyeslot doesn't apply to armor. My rule of thumb on stuff like this is I would ask you the following......

If I was to wear your armor, and you wore minimums, would it be ok for me to trip and fall onto you? Oh, and by the way, have another person then fall on top of me on top of you? Because this will happen in a press in bridge battles, etc.

It's a little hard to tell from your photo, but they do look a little pointy. Although if you wanted to wear them in a tourney only, especially one with more period emphasis, then it would probably be OK.

Chris
Ebonwoulfe Armory is fully stocked with spears again! For now the only way to order them is to send an email to ebonwoulfearmory@gmail.com with the quantity and your shipping address. We will send a PayPal invoice in response including your shipping cost.
User avatar
Tomburr
Archive Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:59 pm
Location: Oklahoma City

Post by Tomburr »

dukelogan wrote:and this is the main problem with the marshallate. too much of this "what if" and "well i think that". the rules are simple, our sport is very safe, and marshals need to learn to follow the letter and not engage in "could might possibly maybe" stuff coupled with the misconception that the human machine is fragile. i mean i still see folks on the field in spurs (with heads all over the ground), hay bales, and dark victory junk.

regards
logan

igelkott wrote:The 1/2" rule into an eyeslot doesn't apply to armor. My rule of thumb on stuff like this is I would ask you the following......

If I was to wear your armor, and you wore minimums, would it be ok for me to trip and fall onto you? Oh, and by the way, have another person then fall on top of me on top of you? Because this will happen in a press in bridge battles, etc.

It's a little hard to tell from your photo, but they do look a little pointy. Although if you wanted to wear them in a tourney only, especially one with more period emphasis, then it would probably be OK.

Chris


Logan has the right of it. Its not the place of marshals to play nanny, they are there to enforce the existing rules and not "legislate form the bench", so to speak.

If you don't want other peoples' armour bits pressed deeply into your flesh, try wearing more than minimum armour. Its your choice not to cover yourself for that eventuality, not your right to tell others how to dress themselves beyond the rules.
Thomas de Bristol
Nissan Maxima wrote:God grant me the courage to change what I can't accept...
losthelm
Archive Member
Posts: 12207
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 1:01 am
Location: albion NY half way between rochester/buffalo
Contact:

Post by losthelm »

I am a bit hesitant to allow it....
Mostly because its behind glass at a museum.


I am in favor of besegews like those pictured if they fit with the rest of your kit.

The besegews look about as sharp as rugby spikes and the location makes it a lot harder to drive the spike into any tender spots.
My only concern is care in the florida weather.
Wilhelm Smydle in the SCA

My Ebay Listings
My ETSY
User avatar
dukelogan
Archive Member
Posts: 5581
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 1:01 am
Location: leading the downward spiral
Contact:

Re: SCA legality question on some besegews.

Post by dukelogan »

to answer you question directly, no.... nobody can point out a rule that would disallow them. the rules, of course, are available for your review at: www.sca.org under the earl marshala tab. then, you ca go the http://trimaris.org/marshal although our website is really not laid out well. somewhere there is a link to the trimarian marshals handbook. ignoring all of the grammatical and formatting errors its a pretty easy read. should answer most of your questions. those that are not answered, or are unclear, can easily be answered with a quick email to our earl marshal. hes a pretty cool guy. :wink:

regards
logan

JvR wrote:I dont know much about SCA armour requirements but will one day play in the SCA. I have a set of besegews for my black and white harness like in the picture. (yeah I know, I have a harness but don't play)

Since the SCA does not allow grappling, I wonder if these would be ok? They have a little point in the middle and wondered if it was a no go as I know the SCA is pretty strict.

Could someone also point out the ruling that would disallow or allow them?

I will ask my local marshal as well if I ever make it to a practice or an event. I just wanted to get a broad opinion on this for now.

pics
Image
Ebonwoulfe Armory is fully stocked with spears again! For now the only way to order them is to send an email to ebonwoulfearmory@gmail.com with the quantity and your shipping address. We will send a PayPal invoice in response including your shipping cost.
User avatar
Thorstenn
Archive Member
Posts: 2131
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Barony of Oldenfeld, Trimaris.

Post by Thorstenn »

Well the tuna can cod piece creeps me out but it's legal too!!
Duke Thorstenn the WrongHand
Trimaris.

"A fully equipped duke costs as much to keep up as two Dreadnoughts, and dukes are just as great a terror -- and they last longer."
David Lloyd George

"Amat victoria curam."
Peikko
Archive Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Formerly the sunny bit of England...Now returned to Malagentia, EK.

Post by Peikko »

Baron Alcyoneus wrote:Aren't tree limbs and twigs padded at Pennsic? ;)


No...definitely not :lol:
"trust me, I'm an archaeologist..."
The Iron Door Collective
http://www.swordfightexeter.org/
User avatar
dukelogan
Archive Member
Posts: 5581
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 1:01 am
Location: leading the downward spiral
Contact:

Post by dukelogan »

ooooohhhhh weve all seen worse at pennsic :shock:

thor, did you get my email?

regards
logan

Thorstenn wrote:Well the tuna can cod piece creeps me out but it's legal too!!
Ebonwoulfe Armory is fully stocked with spears again! For now the only way to order them is to send an email to ebonwoulfearmory@gmail.com with the quantity and your shipping address. We will send a PayPal invoice in response including your shipping cost.
JvR
Archive Member
Posts: 2265
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:42 pm
Location: South Florida

Post by JvR »

Thanks for the info guys. Downloaded the handbook.
JvR
Archive Member
Posts: 2265
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:42 pm
Location: South Florida

Post by JvR »

Thorstenn wrote:I am the Trimarian Earl Marshal. I would have no problem with them at all as long as they don't stick out 3 inches and don't come to a sharp point. If the tip is rounded just a bit it might be better for inter Kingdom events. As I cannot guarantee other Kingdoms approval, I would go to bat for these to be legal.
If a local Marshall gives you grief, send it up to me :wink:

Thor.


They are about 3" and the point may be considered sharp by some. I can push them into my hand and they wont break the skin. No more sharp than my elbow fans. Cant be much worse than spurs. I just might use these for steel fighting if I ever get into that, and have a pair made for SCA with solid rubber spikes.

For now I am just playing around with my armour. I will one day fight in it in the SCA. Thats for sure. Hopefully sometime next summer.

The local Marshall is a great guy and I trust his judgment so that wont be an issue. If he wasn't comfortable with them I would be 100% ok with his ruling. I just thought I would toss out the question on here.
Post Reply