SCA combat, behourd, and dussacken
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 5:47 pm
so, I had a thought today;
why doesn't the SCA use the dussack as their main weapon? It can be paired with buckler or shield, and although is not displayed with a dagger, it was historically used to train for using general one-handed weapons. Given the representation some people have given me that the SCA is closest to historical behourd combat, I feel using the dussack would work fine. Is there anything in the current SCA rules that prohibit the use of wooden or leather dussacks?
-Mag =)
dussack fighters, covering their mouths with their hands, presumably to save teeth;
http://www.thearma.org/arttalk/at18.htm
why doesn't the SCA use the dussack as their main weapon? It can be paired with buckler or shield, and although is not displayed with a dagger, it was historically used to train for using general one-handed weapons. Given the representation some people have given me that the SCA is closest to historical behourd combat, I feel using the dussack would work fine. Is there anything in the current SCA rules that prohibit the use of wooden or leather dussacks?
-Mag =)
dussack fighters, covering their mouths with their hands, presumably to save teeth;
http://www.thearma.org/arttalk/at18.htm