Looking for something else in my Hans Memling book, I found a few images that I'd wanted to find for this subject. He painted a number of picture of people that had garments that used rings to lace through. This picture of Antoine, the Grand Bastard of Burgundy is a good example. Wiki says that it is attributed to Hans Memling, 1467–70, but my book says it is anonymous, after the style of Memling.
One example is the Kalithea greaves. They have exposed rings for lacing them to the leg so the technique dates back to the end of the Bronze Age at least.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment by Pen & Sword books.
There was woss'erface y'know the pale one with the plucked forehead and brows and with one perfectly hemisherical 'funbag' seemingly attached to her collarbone next to her armpit out on show.....Mistress to someone important or French...Alice.....Agnes....BuggeredifIcanremember. But she was mid to late 15thC too.
All things are subject to interpretation, whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power not truth.
“He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves: one for his enemy and one for himself”
I don't believe the Agnes Sorel portrait shows such a thing; it shows what we tend to think of as "hidden" or "invisible" lacing, and is often cited as an example of those. But rings? Not necessarily, though though that's certainly a viable theory -- the rings could be sewn on the inside.
Got a hooooge version of this in a French art book and it looks, to me at least, like rings, by the way the lacing 'sits' and down to the wee stress creases where they (the rings)look to be anchored inside her bodice (Oooo Er Matron..........that prob'ly doesn't mean much outside the UK...Carry On film ref there....back in yer box Digby )
But then that boob isn't erm 'natural', I mean as a chap I've seen my share of.......this isn't going well is it?
What I'm trying to say is it's possibly all an idealised fantasy (Wipe clean gesso anyone) so mebbe the cossie is 'made up' too....which means I've wasted everyones time...... off to scourge myself as penance...Nurse! 50 lashes with the thick rhubarb stick.
All things are subject to interpretation, whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power not truth.
“He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves: one for his enemy and one for himself”
Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar wrote:But then that boob isn't erm 'natural', I mean as a chap I've seen my share of.......this isn't going well is it?
What I'm trying to say is it's possibly all an idealised fantasy (Wipe clean gesso anyone) so mebbe the cossie is 'made up' too....which means I've wasted everyones time...... off to scourge myself as penance...Nurse! 50 lashes with the thick rhubarb stick.
This is also Agnes Sorel, playing herself. Compare and contrast.
They are not substantially different. So either one of the paintings was based directly off of the other physical painting, OR Agnes was just built like that.
Memento, homo, quod cinis es! Et in cenerem reverentis!
The Fouquet Madonna has rings. We saw her in Antwerp, and I have a hi-res photo I'm attempting to upload to my site, but failing on. I'll try again tomorrow.
From my experience with rings, you have to stitch them almost all the way around, or the fabric gapes. I did a side laced hidden ring kirtle, and in order to get good support with it, the rings have to be very close together. Your lace is pretty much running vertically, and it doesn't hold real well.
I'd love to see rings dated earlier. I would like to use rings for my 1410s gown, but without better evidence, can't get away with it.
Do you not know that in the service... one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
And room for a third breast between the other two...'tent natural I tells'eee.
I did a simplified version of the frock for The Mem Sahib some years back and used flat brass washers from an Ironmongers(hardware store) for the lacing rings, stitching over 2/3rds of the ring and sewing through the lining and interlining of the bodice. The outer was tacked to the interlining during construction.
I ran an emery cloth over the edges of each washer to take off any burrs or swarf to lessen the chance of them cutting the thread or wearing the lacing cord.
All things are subject to interpretation, whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power not truth.
“He who seeks vengeance must dig two graves: one for his enemy and one for himself”