1) I can't see clearly enough to make it out - is the chin piece split for removal? It is an armet correct?
2) There are no pictures of you with your visor down. I'd be interested in seeing any pictures you might have in this case to get a feel for the shape of it. If you have any and could email me, that would be greatly appreciated!
3) I notice that while the armet is appropriately narrow about the neck, it is significantly wider at temple level than I realized. Assuming this is accurate (and I have very little reason to think it isn't), was this necessitated by the padding or harness underneath, for some other reason, or was it merely a stylistic feature? It's practically lightbulb-shaped from the front. I was under the impression that these types of helms were traditionally closer to the wearer along the sides, or would that be more appropriate for a 16th C piece? Not that either are necessarily accurate, the armets produced by Bob McPherson and Robert Valentine (as can be seen on their websites) for their own renditions of the Warwick effigy appear to be much more cylindrical in nature, without the drastic change in width. Thoughts?
4) Who constructed that particular helm?
p.s. Why aren't you smiling in that picture? God knows when I get into plate harness I can't stop!

Thanks,

