Kyle's Fantasy Combat Helm *Pic*

This forum is designed to help us spread the knowledge of armouring.
Post Reply
User avatar
Halberds
Archive Member
Posts: 20444
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Republic of Texas

Kyle's Fantasy Combat Helm *Pic*

Post by Halberds »

[img]http://home.armourarchive.org/members/halberds/Kyle's3.2.jpg[/img]
http://home.armourarchive.org/members/h ... yle3.3.jpg
I will let #5 explain...

Halberds
Last edited by Halberds on Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Happy Metal Pounding
MJBlazek
Archive Member
Posts: 8179
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Union Maine
Contact:

Post by MJBlazek »

Actually....except for the spikes..I think its pretty nifty
Lord Alexander Clarke, Righteous Brother of the Priory of St. Colin the Dude, The Bear of Hadchester, Squire to Sir Cedric of Thanet

~Chivalry unpaired with Valor is a meal to starve a mans soul~
User avatar
Magmaforge
Archive Member
Posts: 3281
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:01 am
Location: sweet home Chicago, Rome of the 21st c.

Post by Magmaforge »

so, you say this is for Glen Kyle?
:twisted:
Dufnial Hardraada
Archive Member
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2004 2:01 am
Location: Camas Valley, Oregon
Contact:

Post by Dufnial Hardraada »

First, I have to lay down that the craftsmanship is not bad at all! In fact, it's quite professional. :)

The helm is, however, very fantasy... Which, with generalized definitions of fantasy armour, says a lot.

Otherwise, good job Kyle! :) I like it! (Kind of)
"Chainmaille is the silly puddy of [armour]"
-My little sister Jackie

Dufnial Hardraada

Danny Watson
User avatar
DAVID01
Archive Member
Posts: 3154
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Johnstown (Vinco) Pa.

Post by DAVID01 »

Hal, thats just cool.
Education is a crutch with which the foolish attack the wise to prove that they are not idiots.
User avatar
Henry of Bexley
Archive Member
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:07 pm
Location: Westfield, WI

Post by Henry of Bexley »

One question, Hal- is this for SCA? Has only internal welds passed inspection for you before?

I had to reweld a greathelm on all the outside seams because they defined them as sandwich joints because of the overlap. Maybe there's a "superior workmanship clause" in there, I can't remember.

Just wondering.
NightDaemon
Archive Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Canberra, Straya
Contact:

Post by NightDaemon »

Is there anything behind that decorative brass cross? From what I see of it, its a hole in the helmet with a thin plate over it. If the rivets holding it on break under a hit, that would... hurt, I think.
Half a million boots went slogging through hell
I was the kid with the drum!
Say don't you remember?

Caveat Baro
RenJunkie
Archive Member
Posts: 2487
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 7:36 pm
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Contact:

Post by RenJunkie »

I kninda dig it...without spikes anyway. Looks like a fantasized version of a Mac Bible helm. I kinda dig the spangen too.

Wouldn't breathing be easier without the brass over the cross hole?

Christopher
War kittens?!!!

"Born to lose. Live to win."

Historical Interpreter- Jamestown Settlement Museum
Master's Candidate, East Carolina University
Graduate of The College of William & Mary in Virginia
raito
Archive Member
Posts: 4932
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 9:48 am
Location: Madison, WI

Post by raito »

Horradrick wrote:One question, Hal- is this for SCA? Has only internal welds passed inspection for you before?

I had to reweld a greathelm on all the outside seams because they defined them as sandwich joints because of the overlap. Maybe there's a "superior workmanship clause" in there, I can't remember.

Just wondering.


Here's the construction quote:
All joints or seams shall be constructed in one or a combination of the
following ways:
· Welded on the inside and outside.
· Welded with a single bead that extends through both surfaces.
· Lap joints welded or brazed at the edges of both pieces.
· Helms will be riveted with iron or steel rivets no more than 2-1/ 2
inches (63.5 mm) apart, or with equivalent riveting techniques. Screw
Marshal’s Handbook
10
and or pop type rivets, along with other lightweight rivets, are not to
be used.
· Welds must be sound and rivets secure.

The 'superior workmanship' thing is under securing face bars inside instead of outside.

And to all, it was I who inspected Horradrick's helmet. (It does look a lot better now, and isn't as likely to give the marshall's hives.) Actually, the deinition was 'lap joints'.

There is an oddity (among the host of others) with some of these rules. In this particular case, if Horradrick had made a moveable visor, the side joints wouldn't have needed to be connected to the main part of the helm at all. (It was, in fact, the top of the helm that most needed fixing. He had the bottle cap tab thing going on with dodgy welds holding it down.) But, because it was joined, it needed to have the join conform to the rules. I have lots of other rants with the helm rules in particular.
raito
Archive Member
Posts: 4932
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 9:48 am
Location: Madison, WI

Post by raito »

Horradrick wrote:One question, Hal- is this for SCA? Has only internal welds passed inspection for you before?

I had to reweld a greathelm on all the outside seams because they defined them as sandwich joints because of the overlap. Maybe there's a "superior workmanship clause" in there, I can't remember.

Just wondering.


Here's the construction quote:
All joints or seams shall be constructed in one or a combination of the
following ways:
· Welded on the inside and outside.
· Welded with a single bead that extends through both surfaces.
· Lap joints welded or brazed at the edges of both pieces.
· Helms will be riveted with iron or steel rivets no more than 2-1/ 2
inches (63.5 mm) apart, or with equivalent riveting techniques. Screw
Marshal’s Handbook
10
and or pop type rivets, along with other lightweight rivets, are not to
be used.
· Welds must be sound and rivets secure.

The 'superior workmanship' thing is under securing face bars inside instead of outside.

And to all, it was I who inspected Horradrick's helmet. (It does look a lot better now, and isn't as likely to give the marshall's hives.) Actually, the deinition was 'lap joints'.

There is an oddity (among the host of others) with some of these rules. In this particular case, if Horradrick had made a moveable visor, the side joints wouldn't have needed to be connected to the main part of the helm at all. (It was, in fact, the top of the helm that most needed fixing. He had the bottle cap tab thing going on with dodgy welds holding it down.) But, because it was joined, it needed to have the join conform to the rules. I have lots of other rants with the helm rules in particular.

Anyway, helms appear to be the only thing that Horradrick has troubles with. The rest of his kit is very nice.
User avatar
Halberds
Archive Member
Posts: 20444
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Republic of Texas

Post by Halberds »

Yes, Kyle built this helm and he wants to fight SCA.

Hal
Happy Metal Pounding
User avatar
InsaneIrish
SQUEEE!
Posts: 18252
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Jefferson City Mo. USA

Post by InsaneIrish »

Halberds wrote:Yes, Kyle built this helm and he wants to fight SCA.

Hal


structurally speaking it looks very well done.

From a historical stand point it looks like the helmet of the leader of the Juns from "BeastMaster" and better suited for a fantasy LARP group than SCA combat.
Insane Irish

Quote: "Nissan Maxima"
(on Pennsic) I know that movie. It is the 13th warrior. A bunch of guys in armour that doesn't match itself or anybody elses, go on a trip and argue and get drunk and get laid and then fight Tuchux.
mattmaus
Archive Member
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Colorado Springs,CO
Contact:

Post by mattmaus »

raito wrote:Actually, the deinition was 'lap joints'.


This again....

<sigh>
It looked better in my head....
Damnit.
User avatar
Token Bastard
Archive Member
Posts: 2446
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Contact:

Post by Token Bastard »

I'd think those spikes would chew up rattan like a mo fo in SCA combat... And is it just me, or does the back of the bottom of this helm look like it slopes waaaay too much? Upwards, I mean. It just has the look that if you sit it on your head, face guard almost flush against your face, the back would be flaring out way too much. But, if you sat it with the back of the helm more flush against your head, the front would be angled way far away from your face. Just from the photos provided, unless he has absolutely no neck whatsoever, the helm looks just a little hard to pass SCA safety guidelines.

Looks damned cool, though. I like it.

-Ed
Edric "Mr." the Bastard
Argent Company, Grunt
User avatar
kylerillis
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 1:18 pm
Location: Texas

Post by kylerillis »

thanks for the input as for the spikes chewing up rattan they are removable the back flair only appears to be to high planned to wear a bever with helm now have decided to build different helm
formerly apprentice #5
Post Reply